2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5288-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driving pressure in obese ventilated patients: another brick in the (chest) wall

Abstract: The incidence of obesity is increasing worldwide, and obese or severely obese patients often present with several comorbidities. Obesity is associated with significant complications, and an increase in the mortality of obese patients after hospital admission compared to non-obese patients is justified [1]. The proportion of obesity in patients presenting with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has not been investigated systematically, but data from the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in 2009 suggested that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in non-COVID-19 patients, an “obesity paradox” has been described with an increased risk for developing pneumonia and ARDS in obese patients but no increase in mortality, or even better ICU survival rates than underweight patients in some series [ 39 42 ]. Kon et al [ 41 ] hypothesized that this better survival in obese patients could be the consequence of the relative early lung failure due to altered respiratory mechanics (altered chest wall compliance, increase in intra-abdominal pressure, lung-volume reduction [ 43 ]), leading at the time of ECMO initiation to less lung parenchymal lesions and to faster recovery. Our results are consistent with this hypothesis with shorter time from ICU admission to intubation and ECMO in obese patients, and with a trend to better compliance with higher PEEP levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in non-COVID-19 patients, an “obesity paradox” has been described with an increased risk for developing pneumonia and ARDS in obese patients but no increase in mortality, or even better ICU survival rates than underweight patients in some series [ 39 42 ]. Kon et al [ 41 ] hypothesized that this better survival in obese patients could be the consequence of the relative early lung failure due to altered respiratory mechanics (altered chest wall compliance, increase in intra-abdominal pressure, lung-volume reduction [ 43 ]), leading at the time of ECMO initiation to less lung parenchymal lesions and to faster recovery. Our results are consistent with this hypothesis with shorter time from ICU admission to intubation and ECMO in obese patients, and with a trend to better compliance with higher PEEP levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Conversely, it does not predict mortality in obese ARDS. 9 The actual influence of chest wall on obese respiratory mechanics has been debated, as some experts claim that the "stiff " chest wall of obese patients could impair their respiratory mechanics, 10 while others did not find any difference with nonobese patients. 11 Recently, complete airway closure has been suggested in ARDS.…”
Section: What This Article Tells Us That Is Newmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors even postulated that these reduced values of driving pressure may somehow be related to the "obesity paradox" of ARDS: adiposity may offer some protection against ventilator-induced lung injury by means of the altered chestwall dynamics. 109 Indeed, the same tidal volume can generate far different lung distending pressure even in nonobese patients with ARDS, 103 and the link between tidal volume and the lung stress it induced is the amount of ventilatable lung volume open to ventilation, i.e., the size of the so-called "baby lung." 110 Since the size of the baby lung is represented by the FRC, and this is significantly reduced in obese patients with ARDS, it seems prudent in these patients to limit even further the size of the tidal ventilation.…”
Section: Mechanical Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%