2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00232-017-0012-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driving Forces of Translocation Through Bacterial Translocon SecYEG

Abstract: This review focusses on the energetics of protein translocation via the Sec translocation machinery. First we complement structural data about SecYEG’s conformational rearrangements by insight obtained from functional assays. These include measurements of SecYEG permeability that allow assessment of channel gating by ligand binding and membrane voltage. Second we will discuss the power stroke and Brownian ratcheting models of substrate translocation and the role that the two models assign to the putative drivi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a more likely explanation of our results is that positive charges at the N‐terminus of the nascent peptide interact with negative charges of the rRNA of the ribosome tunnel wall, which causes retention of the N‐terminus and inversion of TM1 within the tunnel upon continued peptide elongation. In vivo, the membrane potential may additionally influence topogenesis of membrane proteins in bacteria (Andersson & von Heijne, ; Cao et al , ; van der Laan et al , ; Knyazev et al , ). Movement of the nascent chain toward the tunnel exit and into the translocon requires that eventually the N‐terminus is released from the electrostatic interactions in the tunnel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a more likely explanation of our results is that positive charges at the N‐terminus of the nascent peptide interact with negative charges of the rRNA of the ribosome tunnel wall, which causes retention of the N‐terminus and inversion of TM1 within the tunnel upon continued peptide elongation. In vivo, the membrane potential may additionally influence topogenesis of membrane proteins in bacteria (Andersson & von Heijne, ; Cao et al , ; van der Laan et al , ; Knyazev et al , ). Movement of the nascent chain toward the tunnel exit and into the translocon requires that eventually the N‐terminus is released from the electrostatic interactions in the tunnel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy provided by SecA dependent hydrolysis of ATP is required for protein translocation of secreted proteins across the SecYEG channel 43 and large extramembrane domains of polytopic membrane proteins 44 . ΔΨ can contribute directly to translocation and drive translocation of preprotein residues or extramembrane domains containing large numbers of negatively charged amino acids electrophoretically [45][46][47] . SecDF may couple proton-motive force (PMF) to the release of the translocated polypeptides from SecYEG translocon 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While SecYEG provides the pathway for protein translocation, SecA affords part of the translocation energy by hydrolyzing ATP, the other part being provided by the proton motive force. 1 SecA gains access to the SecYEG complex via a lipid-bound intermediate state. 2 Its highly amphipathic N-terminal helix carries positively charged amino acids aligned on one side, and hydrophobic amino acids on the other which interact with negatively charged phospholipids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%