Environment &Amp; Policy
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2158-5_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driving Forces for Changes in Land Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result supports evidence that maize, sorghum, and millet are competing crops to cotton (Mittal and Reimer, 2008). Likewise, Brons et al (2004) reported strong negative cross‐price elasticity between cotton and sorghum on cotton yields in Mali. In contrast, Vitale et al (2009) found a weak positive cross‐price of sorghum and cotton on cotton acreage, which was, however, cancelled out by the negative millet‐cotton cross‐price estimates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This result supports evidence that maize, sorghum, and millet are competing crops to cotton (Mittal and Reimer, 2008). Likewise, Brons et al (2004) reported strong negative cross‐price elasticity between cotton and sorghum on cotton yields in Mali. In contrast, Vitale et al (2009) found a weak positive cross‐price of sorghum and cotton on cotton acreage, which was, however, cancelled out by the negative millet‐cotton cross‐price estimates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In general, fewer estimated price coefficients remain significant when their absolute values are included. Similarly, in their estimated supply responses for cotton and cereals (maize, sorghum, and millet) in Mali and Burkina Faso, Brons et al (2004) found that the coefficients of crops’ own prices were not statistically significant. This finding supports the argument that cotton farming decisions are mostly based on relative prices rather than on farm‐gate cotton prices alone, and thus, have important implications in terms of pricing policy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations