Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls

Abstract

Urbanization creates new ecological conditions that can affect biodiversity at all levels, including the diversity and prevalence of parasites of species that may occupy these environments. However, few studies have compared bird–ectoparasite interactions between urban and rural individuals. Here, we analyze the ectoparasite community and co-infection patterns of urban and rural burrowing owls, Athene cunicularia, to assess the influence of host traits (i.e., sex, age, and weight), and environmental factors (i.e., number of conspecifics per nest, habitat type and aridity) on its composition. Ectoparasites of burrowing owls included two lice, one flea, and one mite. The overall prevalence for mites, lice and fleas was 1.75%, 8.76% and 3.50%, respectively. A clear pattern of co-infection was detected between mites and fleas and, to less extent, between mites and lice. Adult owls harbored fewer ectoparasites than nestlings, and adult females harbored more lice than males. Our results also show that mite and flea numbers were higher when more conspecifics cohabited the same burrow, while lice showed the opposite pattern. Rural individuals showed higher flea parasitism and lower mite parasitism than urban birds. Moreover, mite numbers were negatively correlated with aridity and host weight. Although the ectoparasitic load of burrowing owls appears to be influenced by individual age, sex, number of conspecifics per nest, and habitat characteristics, the pattern of co-infection found among ectoparasites could also be mediated by unexplored factors such as host immune response, which deserves further research.

Co‐parasitism in the face of predation: Effects of natural enemies on a neotropical mockingbird

“…Most bird studies have been surveys of co‐occurring blood parasite species (Clark et al, 2016; Garcia‐Longoria et al, 2022; Oakgrove et al, 2014; Santiago‐Alarcon et al, 2011; Villalva‐Pasillas et al, 2020). Other studies have been surveys of coinfection with different viruses (Agliani et al, 2023; Wille et al, 2015), viruses and blood parasites (Medeiros et al, 2014), or ectoparasites of different kinds (Sáez‐Ventura et al, 2022). Mark‐recapture methods have also been used to demonstrate negative correlations between blood parasite coinfections and the survival of birds in natural populations (Davidar & Morton, 2006; Marzal et al, 2008; Pigeault et al, 2018).…”