Drivers of telemedicine use: comparative evidence from samples of Spanish, Colombian and Bolivian physicians

Abstract

BackgroundThe aim of the study presented in this article is to analyse the determinants of telemedicine use. To that end, the study makes two basic contributions. First, it considers six working hypotheses in the context of technology acceptance models (TAMs). Second, it uses data obtained for three samples of physicians from three different countries (Spain, Colombia and Bolivia). Obtaining and comparing evidence on an international scale allows determinants of telemedicine use to be evaluated across different contexts.MethodsIn Bolivia, the survey was conducted in hospitals and health care centres of the urban and rural districts of the municipality of Sucre, in a population comprising a total of 350 physicians. In Spain, the survey population consisted of medical professionals of all profiles affiliated with health care within the Canary Islands Health Service, comprising a total of 356 physicians. Finally, in Colombia, it was conducted in the Society of Surgery Service at San José Hospital of Bogotá, in a population comprising a total of 184 physicians. Using an extended TAM and survey data from 510 physicians (113 in Spain, 118 in Colombia and 279 in Bolivia), binary logistic regression analysis was performed.ResultsIn the three samples, it was found that the physician's level of information and communication technology (ICT) use in his/her personal life was the variable that had the highest explanatory power regarding telemedicine use. In the Spanish sample, the physicians' perceived ease-of-use of ICTs in clinical practice and propensity to innovate were the two other variables that determined telemedicine use, whereas in the Colombian and Bolivian samples, it was the level of optimism about ICTs.ConclusionThe results facilitated a more complete model that includes personal, usability, and innovatory aspects in the explanation of Telemedicine use in Spain, whereas the results for the Latin American samples indicated a more primary model in the explanation of Telemedicine use, which was completed by an optimism factor that did not emerge in the Spanish sample.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0128-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Modeling and Predicting Outcomes of eHealth Usage by European Physicians: Multidimensional Approach from a Survey of 9196 General Practitioners (Preprint)

“…eHealth usage takes place initially in internal practices and is then transferred to practices with patients. In addition, the results of this study revealed the key role that Telemedicine would play in the sense that, through training programs, upskilling and learning, it would enable eHealth usage to be transferred from internal practices to practices with patients [46].…”

Design and validation of a questionnaire to measure the acceptance of telemedicine by healthcare professionals in Germany

“…Out of 253 records, 17 studies were ltered out and passed the eligibility test. Frequency analysis and clustering of acceptance factors for studies in the review Fifty-eight different construct relationships could be identi ed in these 17 studies [34,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54] Only those constructs that were supported more than twice in a construct relationship were picked out. Clearly, the review shows that the core constructs from the original models, like behavioral intention (BI), impacted by attitude (ATT), and in uenced by perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU), were also identi ed in these studies as essential variables.…”

“…I feel comfortable with information and communication technology. [45,47] HAB4 I feel comfortable with using and consulting technology for my patients in my daily business.…”

La Telemedicina en Colombia: realidad moral y jurídica

“…Al referirse al daño, se está hablando de la conservación de derechos, como el de la intimidad, en cada fase del actuar médico: diagnóstico, pronóstico, tratamiento y rehabilitación. Por lo tanto, determinar un adecuado marco deontológico y médico legal en la evolución de la medicina, ha llevado al surgimiento de dilemas acerca de las prácticas científicas de la ciencia médica; esto, siendo el gran reto el mejoramiento de la salud humana con el empleo de la innovación (Saigí-Rubió, Torrent-Sellens, & Jiménez-Zarco, 2014).…”