2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.100335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of selectivity in family firms: Understanding the impact of age and ownership on CSR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We could not reject the hypothesis that there was no significant relationship between ownership structure and CSR disclosure among Nigerian firms. Thus, contrary to the earlier findings of Madden, McMillan, and Harris (2020) and Tang, Yang, and Yang (2020) our conclusion was that firms' ownership does not significantly influence CSR engagement and/or disclosure. The implication was that even though owners may have the capacity to influence companies' policies; their level of sensitivity to reporting practice may not be a significant determinant of CSR disclosure by firms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We could not reject the hypothesis that there was no significant relationship between ownership structure and CSR disclosure among Nigerian firms. Thus, contrary to the earlier findings of Madden, McMillan, and Harris (2020) and Tang, Yang, and Yang (2020) our conclusion was that firms' ownership does not significantly influence CSR engagement and/or disclosure. The implication was that even though owners may have the capacity to influence companies' policies; their level of sensitivity to reporting practice may not be a significant determinant of CSR disclosure by firms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational negative characteristics badly influence the trust and the purchase intentions of consumers. On the other hand, organizational positive characteristics enhance corporate image and build a strong relationship with the consumers to purchase its products (24,29,48). Based on the above literature, we can propose our hypothesis as follows: H 12 : The negative impact of corporate cynical impression could be reduced upon consumer purchase intention when we introduce Economic and Legal CSR as mediators in this relationship.…”
Section: Organizational Cynicism and Consumers Purchase Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Whereas legal CSR is concerned with rules and regulations which organizations must follow (28). It includes expectations, specific rules, and regulations as well as the role with respect to playing regulations (29,30). Legislations, control, and regulations are essential drivers toward compliances and compulsory for the existing CSR standards.…”
Section: Economic and Legal Csrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, they are prone to contribute more to the efficiency of the ethical decision-making process than small boards, which could lead to a better CSR performance [Hillman et al, 2001;Clarkson 1995;and Pfeffer and Salancik, 1978]. For instance, the mean board size of a firm is around 9 members in European firms and US firms [Haque and Jones, 2020;and Madden et al, 2020]. Table 1.2 presents descriptive statistics of the study of Beji et al [2020] on the association between boards' characteristics and globally CSR and specific areas of CSR, conducted on French companies listed on the SBF 120 d index between 2003 However, the agency theory holds that agency problems can become more severe with larger boards, specifically when they suffer from coordination and communication problems [Hermalin and Weisbach, 2003;Bushman and Smith, 2001;and Yermack, 1996].…”
Section: Ii11 Diversity Of Boardsmentioning
confidence: 99%