2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of renewable technology adoption in the household sector

Abstract: This series presents research findings based either directly on data from the German Socio-Economic Panel study (SOEP) or using SOEP data as part of an internationally comparable data set (e.g. CNEF, ECHP, LIS, LWS, CHER/PACO). SOEP is a truly multidisciplinary household panel study covering a wide range of social and behavioral sciences: economics, sociology, psychology, survey methodology, econometrics and applied statistics, educational science, political science, public health, behavioral genetics, demogr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding indicates that cost was a barrier and had persisted over the years, even if microgeneration system installation has become less expensive, despite the fact that subsidies have reduced the total budget need. This finding is consistent with the wider literature and the status quo in other countries; Palm and Tengvard [47] reported that Swedish households rejected small-scale photovoltaic panel (PV) and micro wind turbine installation because of financial considerations, Balcombe et al [42] pointed out that British consumers were not willing to pay extra for the environmental benefits that microgeneration technologies offered, Jacksohn et al [98] noted that German household investments in PV and solar thermal systems were mainly driven by economic factors, while Graziano and Gillingham [102] indicated that installation and operation cost were important factors for the installation of PV systems in American (Connecticut) households. Besides, as Palm [103] has noted for the case of PV adoption in Sweden, cost was a barrier persisting over the years, although installation became cheaper due to lower product costs and the application of subsidy schemes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding indicates that cost was a barrier and had persisted over the years, even if microgeneration system installation has become less expensive, despite the fact that subsidies have reduced the total budget need. This finding is consistent with the wider literature and the status quo in other countries; Palm and Tengvard [47] reported that Swedish households rejected small-scale photovoltaic panel (PV) and micro wind turbine installation because of financial considerations, Balcombe et al [42] pointed out that British consumers were not willing to pay extra for the environmental benefits that microgeneration technologies offered, Jacksohn et al [98] noted that German household investments in PV and solar thermal systems were mainly driven by economic factors, while Graziano and Gillingham [102] indicated that installation and operation cost were important factors for the installation of PV systems in American (Connecticut) households. Besides, as Palm [103] has noted for the case of PV adoption in Sweden, cost was a barrier persisting over the years, although installation became cheaper due to lower product costs and the application of subsidy schemes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This result comes as no surprise if not considered collectively [46,97]. Besides, subsidies efficiency has been studied before, proving that individuals are more likely to proceed with upgrading their residence energy efficiency using microgeneration systems when rebates are offered, as reported for the cases of Sweden [98], Italy [99], and the United States [100]. Thus, the government should consider, after providing more information to the public about the domestic microgeneration systems, further increasing the subsidiaries budget [101].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As of 2017, all of the district governments offer this subsidy (only 1 in 2014, 5 in 2015, and 14 in 2016). Similarly, the revenues and costs mainly affect the decision of installation for residential solar PVs [ 34 ]. Meanwhile, a recent study [ 35 ] suggested that the decision factors to uptake RSPVs differ between earlier and later adopters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most found that people tend to prefer renewable energy [19][20][21][22][23]. After the Fukushima nuclear accident, as some previous studies identified, the public's view on the reliability of nuclear energy worsened, while it raised the profile of renewable energy, which drew the attention of the world [8,[24][25][26][27]. In Japan, public support for and trust in nuclear power have visibly collapsed after the Fukushima accident [28,29].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%