2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-021-02260-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers of genetic diversity in plant populations differ between semi-natural grassland types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Population size via population genetic consequences, therefore, represents an important, but interestingly not the most important factor shaping ITV in T. montanum populations. The here investigated positive relationships among population size, genetic diversity, and ITV as an indicator for performance (e.g., Hensen et al, 2005 ; Leimu et al, 2006 ; Reisch et al, 2021 ; Rosche et al, 2022 ), and among genetic diversity, habitat heterogeneity, and ITV (e.g., Karbstein, Prinz, et al, 2020 ; Waitt & Levin, 1998 ) are consistent with literature. In general, small as opposed to large T. montanum populations are characterized by medium to extreme environmental habitat factor and functional trait values (several niche pessima), higher (LAI, soil K and pH) and lower (soil depth and N, altitude) variability of certain abiotic environmental factors, lowered genetic diversity, elevated inbreeding and differentiation, and finally lower ITV and performance (Table 5 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Population size via population genetic consequences, therefore, represents an important, but interestingly not the most important factor shaping ITV in T. montanum populations. The here investigated positive relationships among population size, genetic diversity, and ITV as an indicator for performance (e.g., Hensen et al, 2005 ; Leimu et al, 2006 ; Reisch et al, 2021 ; Rosche et al, 2022 ), and among genetic diversity, habitat heterogeneity, and ITV (e.g., Karbstein, Prinz, et al, 2020 ; Waitt & Levin, 1998 ) are consistent with literature. In general, small as opposed to large T. montanum populations are characterized by medium to extreme environmental habitat factor and functional trait values (several niche pessima), higher (LAI, soil K and pH) and lower (soil depth and N, altitude) variability of certain abiotic environmental factors, lowered genetic diversity, elevated inbreeding and differentiation, and finally lower ITV and performance (Table 5 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Accordingly, although abiotic environment can act on genetic diversity via natural selection (Linhardt & Grant, 1996;Reisch et al, 2021;Sakaguchi et al, 2019), we did not detect selective pressure here, likely due to the applied neutral marker type and to insufficient abiotic selective pressures within habitats (Figure 4). Increased ITV based on functional traits (i.e., number of different functional phenotypes, e.g., small-high plants with low-high biomass tender-robust leaves, and low-high stomatal conductance) and healthy individuals (i.e., moderate to high photosynthetic performance and stress indicators) shows that many large populations perform well under given environmental conditions and concerning their genetic background, implying positive plant performance.…”
Section: Environment Population Size Genetics and Itvmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation