2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drivers for mass and momentum exchange between the main channel and river bank lateral cavities

Abstract: 2020. Drivers for mass and momentum exchange between the main channel and river bank lateral cavities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(81 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mixing layer is characterized by the advection of quasiperiodic, large-scale vortices [10,12,13] that are shed from the upstream corner of the interface. Their impingement [3,14] on the downstream corner of the interface excites local free-surface oscillations and an intermittent inflow toward the cavity [6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mixing layer is characterized by the advection of quasiperiodic, large-scale vortices [10,12,13] that are shed from the upstream corner of the interface. Their impingement [3,14] on the downstream corner of the interface excites local free-surface oscillations and an intermittent inflow toward the cavity [6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the fixed free surface condition will prevent flow to have interactions with a real free surface (Ouro et al 2020). This will mean that the seiching will not be present and that the vortex detachments interacting with the free surface will not exist (Chetibi et al 2019).…”
Section: Initial and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average exchange coefficient, e, in this zone was 0.2 in case of impermeable spur, while it was 0.08 in case of slit type one, indicates weaker turbulence coherent structure in silt type spur. By performing large eddy simulation (LES) in case of river bank lateral cavities, it was concluded [64] that in transverse direction, pressure gradient contributes largely to flushing momentum out of the cavities (embayment in this case) while Reynolds normal stress and convection are responsible for its entraining into the cavity. Figure 20 shows a similar agreement of the higher-pressure gradient in case of slit type spur.…”
Section: Application Of Slit-type Spurs In the Brahmaputra-jamuna Rivermentioning
confidence: 99%