Drivers, Enablers, Barriers and Technologies (DEBT) For Low-Energy Public Housing Delivery in Nigeria

Abstract

Nigeria, as a developing country, has vast and varied energy resources, both renewable and non-renewable. In spite of these resources, an estimated 75% of her population of close to 200 million faces serious energy poverty problems due to shortfalls in energy supply compared to its energy demand. Consequently, a large portion of the population lives without access to adequate electricity. Hence, the country encounters unprecedented struggles with incessant power outages, unemployment, a low human development index (HDI), and poverty. This paper examines the drivers, enablers, barriers, and technological considerations for low-energy integration in the provision of housing for Nigeria's huge population. The objective is to harness the varied energy resources to aid in the delivery of environmentally friendly and sustainable housing in a developing economy such as Nigeria. This is critical in light of rising energy costs, environmental degradation, global warming, greenhouse gas emissions, and energy consumption. Reduced energy use in housing is highlighted as a critical issue in environmental management. The paper highlighted several factors that need to be appropriately addressed for a paradigm shift to low-energy integration to achieve sustainable housing delivery in Nigeria. It recommends the application of energy conservation measures in mass housing construction, the full exploitation and promotion of renewable energy resources, and energy efficiency practices in housing provision, among others. The paper concludes that these should be given adequate attention during planning, designing, and delivering sustainable housing.

Achieving Sustainable Transdisciplinary Research in Construction Project Management

“…Future studies should also focus on the operationalisation of these theories within practical settings, evaluating their effectiveness in real-world scenarios and refining them based on iterative feedback. There is a need to foster collaborative environments where stakeholders from academia, industry, and policy can co-create knowledge (Abbas et al, 2022;Abdullahi and Kehinde, 2023;Adabre et al, 2022;Adewunmi et al, 2023;Afsar et al, 2020;Aigbavboa et al, 2017;Chan et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2017;Dobarrio Machado Ciccarino and Serrano Fernandes Rodrigues, 2023;Godin et al, 2021;Golić et al, 2023;Hagbert et al, 2013;Hosseini et al, 2018;Jelinek et al, 2024;Kaur Bedi, 2018;Khan et al, 2022;Latos, 2018;O'higgins, 2001;Olanrewaju et al, 2022;Parafiniuk, 2014;Portillo-Tarragona et al, 2018;Scarpellini et al, 2020;Shi et al, 2013;Silvius and Schipper, 2014;Venkata Mohan et al, 2016;Yin and Li, 2018;Zabalza Bribián et al, 2011;Zheng et al, 2017;Zhou et al, 2021). This would not only enhance the relevance and applicability of theoretical models but also ensure that they are informed by a rich tapestry of experiences and perspectives.…”