2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/4826206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DriverFinder: A Gene Length-Based Network Method to Identify Cancer Driver Genes

Abstract: Integration of multi-omics data of cancer can help people to explore cancers comprehensively. However, with a large volume of different omics and functional data being generated, there is a major challenge to distinguish functional driver genes from a sea of inconsequential passenger genes that accrue stochastically but do not contribute to cancer development. In this paper, we present a gene length-based network method, named DriverFinder, to identify driver genes by integrating somatic mutations, copy number… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feature importance based on the mean decrease in accuracy shows that the most important feature on a gene-level is the gene length. The current findings appear to be well supported by the DriverFinder study, which states that variants tend to occur more in longer genes [49], yet this study is concentrated on driver genes and not driver mutations. Therefore, there is a high chance of including false positive driver mutations during the extraction phase based on driver genes, which are regarded as being a driver for the reason that they are inside a driver gene [8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The feature importance based on the mean decrease in accuracy shows that the most important feature on a gene-level is the gene length. The current findings appear to be well supported by the DriverFinder study, which states that variants tend to occur more in longer genes [49], yet this study is concentrated on driver genes and not driver mutations. Therefore, there is a high chance of including false positive driver mutations during the extraction phase based on driver genes, which are regarded as being a driver for the reason that they are inside a driver gene [8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This gold standard known cancer gene set includes 576 genes (July 2019) 1 . Many cancer studies use CGC genes as the benchmark for the evaluation ( Bashashati et al, 2012 ; Hou and Ma, 2014 ; Bertrand et al, 2015 ; Wei et al, 2017 ; Guo et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date, no golden standard of cancer drivers exists, and the CGC stands as the most robust and comprehensive resource available. Thus, it serves as the main reference point that the majority of studies use to evaluate their predicted driver genes and method [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. To our knowledge, a similar well-curated resource of cancer driver genes driven by methylation changes does not exist.…”
Section: Oncogenic Mediator Log2fcmentioning
confidence: 99%