2021
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2020.2995722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driver Profiling Using Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For identifying specific driving style, Boyce et al have summarized the similar characteristics of radical drivers and have pointed out that young drivers often have a radical style and are prone to speeding violations [93]; Musselwhite have also made a detailed classification for radical drivers. They have combined driving with the environment and given four sub-dimensions: unintentional adventure, environmental feedback adventure, computational adventure, and continuous adventure [94]; Cura et al have developed NN models based on LSTM and CNN respectively, focusing on acceleration, deceleration, and lane change behavior, and have conducted more detailed style analysis on aggressive bus drivers [95]; Gatteschi et al have conducted a further subdivision study on the aggressiveness of driving behavior to non-motor vehicles [96]. For classification methodologies of driving styles, Abdelrahman et al have proposed a framework for calculating driver risk status judgment based on baseline driving events and risk probability prediction, and have realized effective prediction of driving risk level with the help of machine learning (ML) model [97]; also based on ML algorithms, Yuksel et al have proposed a high-precision and low-cost driver risk assessment black box system based on the driving data that can be obtained from accelerometers and gyroscope sensors and have specifically pointed out that the system can be used in vehicle UBI products [98].…”
Section: Research On Differentiated Macro Driving Stylementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For identifying specific driving style, Boyce et al have summarized the similar characteristics of radical drivers and have pointed out that young drivers often have a radical style and are prone to speeding violations [93]; Musselwhite have also made a detailed classification for radical drivers. They have combined driving with the environment and given four sub-dimensions: unintentional adventure, environmental feedback adventure, computational adventure, and continuous adventure [94]; Cura et al have developed NN models based on LSTM and CNN respectively, focusing on acceleration, deceleration, and lane change behavior, and have conducted more detailed style analysis on aggressive bus drivers [95]; Gatteschi et al have conducted a further subdivision study on the aggressiveness of driving behavior to non-motor vehicles [96]. For classification methodologies of driving styles, Abdelrahman et al have proposed a framework for calculating driver risk status judgment based on baseline driving events and risk probability prediction, and have realized effective prediction of driving risk level with the help of machine learning (ML) model [97]; also based on ML algorithms, Yuksel et al have proposed a high-precision and low-cost driver risk assessment black box system based on the driving data that can be obtained from accelerometers and gyroscope sensors and have specifically pointed out that the system can be used in vehicle UBI products [98].…”
Section: Research On Differentiated Macro Driving Stylementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where h t is the summary of input xt and the past hidden layer state ht-1, U (z) , W (z) , U (r) , W (r) , U and W is a trainable parameter matrix. However, both the GRU and the LSTM network can only consider the information of the past time of the prediction point, but cannot consider the state of the future time, so the prediction accuracy cannot be further improved [23][24]. BiGRU adds a hidden layer on the basis of bidirectional GRU neural network, divides the prediction process into two directions: forward prediction and backward prediction, and determines the output result jointly by the hidden layer of the two directions.…”
Section: Figure 2 a Structure Of Gru Neural Network Circulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the increase of vehicle fuel efficiency has become a key research field due to its substantial impact on the usage of fossil fuel and global carbon repercussions [86]. In the evaluation of driver behavior, various control systems, such as controller area network (CAN bus) of public transports or LSTM deep learning predictor controller, cloud computing platform, and sensors have been developed to categorize and evaluate the eco-driving performance of bus drivers and to characterize driver behavior by engine speed, deceleration, pedaling, corner turn, and lane change endeavors [72,73,103].…”
Section: ) Benefits Related To Increasing Energy Conservation Awareness Of Drivermentioning
confidence: 99%