2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2007.4379556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driver Distraction Detection with a Camera Vision System

Abstract: Driver assistance systems and electronics (e.g. navigators, cell phones, etc.) steal increasing amounts of driver attention. Therefore, the vehicle industry is striving to build a driving environment where input-output devices are smartly scheduled, allowing sufficient time for the driver to focus attention on the surrounding traffic. To enable a smart human-machine interface (HMI), the driver's momentary state needs to be measured. This paper describes a facility for monitoring the distraction of a driver a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
62
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
7
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of the model based on generic training set is .88, and the specificity of the model is .94. Our accuracy in detecting texting while driving is comparable to or sometimes higher than other attempts to detect cognitive distraction and visual distraction (Kutila, Jokela, Markkula, & Rue, 2007). For example, achieved an average accuracy of 81.1% in detecting driver cognitive distraction using Support Vector Machines.…”
Section: Prediction Based On Generic Training Setmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The sensitivity of the model based on generic training set is .88, and the specificity of the model is .94. Our accuracy in detecting texting while driving is comparable to or sometimes higher than other attempts to detect cognitive distraction and visual distraction (Kutila, Jokela, Markkula, & Rue, 2007). For example, achieved an average accuracy of 81.1% in detecting driver cognitive distraction using Support Vector Machines.…”
Section: Prediction Based On Generic Training Setmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…5). Because the rUFOV concept is based on gaze and head orientations as input calculations have been added to the TrackEye software [9]. The experiments indicated that performance of the low-cost eye tracking system is sufficient for evaluating whether the proposed rUFOV algorithm works, but when implementing real in-vehicle product, a more sophisticated eye tracker is needed.…”
Section: Experimental Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kutila et al [8] describes a facility for monitoring the distraction of a driver and presents some early evaluation results. They present a module that is able to detect the driver's visual and cognitive workload by fusing stereo vision and lane tracking data, running both rule-based and support-vector machine (SVM) classification methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%