2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driver distraction analysis using face pose cues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their model outperformed them all with a detection accuracy of 79.84%. Furthermore, Hari C.V. and Praveen Sankaran [23] proposed a two-layer cluster approach with Gabor features and SVM for classification and achieved an accuracy of 95.8%. This approach was compared with deep learning-constructed CNN.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, their model outperformed them all with a detection accuracy of 79.84%. Furthermore, Hari C.V. and Praveen Sankaran [23] proposed a two-layer cluster approach with Gabor features and SVM for classification and achieved an accuracy of 95.8%. This approach was compared with deep learning-constructed CNN.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the eye state is a measure that is widely used by researchers [17][18][19][20], it is highly sensitive to light and glasses. Other facial measures are yawning [20][21][22] and head position [23,24]. In addition, behavioral characteristics can be fused with vehicle measures, such as the steering wheel angle and grip, lane monitoring and speed [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar idea was proposed in [137], [138], which extracted the head pose using a coordinate-pair-angle-method (CPAM) and then DNN for further classification. Praveen et al [226] demonstrated the feasibility of distraction detection by tracking the face pose using a clustered approach based on Gabor features. The full-scale information of a human body was leveraged by an ensemble of ResNets in [227] to distinguish distraction from images of normal driving, yielding an accuracy of 94.28% on the American University in Cairo (AUC) dataset.…”
Section: B Distraction Detection On Human Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve road safety, various in-vehicle sensing technologies have been employed to detect driver drowsiness in real-time [ 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Most notably, researchers have frequently resorted to camera-based solutions that rely on various visual features of the eye, mouth, head, or body to assess driver states, e.g., fatigue or distraction [ 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%