2010
DOI: 10.3182/20100712-3-de-2013.00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driver assistance system for lane departure avoidance by steering and differential braking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where t is current time, t is the time step, and α is a weighting coefficient that adjusts the weighting of the calculation of (5) and (9).…”
Section: Potential Field Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where t is current time, t is the time step, and α is a weighting coefficient that adjusts the weighting of the calculation of (5) and (9).…”
Section: Potential Field Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some driver assistance systems for lane departure avoidance, the system will take over if driver inattentiveness as well as the risk of lane departure are found. For such systems, methods to switch between the driver and the system have been studied [9]- [11]. Different collision avoidance methods have been proposed for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) or mobile robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], an adaptive longitudinal driving assistance system include adaptive cruise control and forward collision avoidance system considering driver behavior and characteristic is proposed and a recursive least square self-learning algorithm for driver characteristic modeling is introduced. In [12], a lane departure avoidance system is applied to prevent the driver from inattention lane change based on the combination of lateral active steering controller and longitudinal differential braking controller. In [13], this paper studies driver braking intention on the testbed of commercial vehicles with multiple drivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these systems has been proven to help to reduce the occurrence of ROR crashes within particular scenarios. [10][11][12][13] While these safety systems can offer better reductions in single-vehicle ROR crashes than roadway modifications can, they suffer from similar limitations. Each of these systems performs well when the driver behaves within nominal limits but, for more extreme departure cases and poor performance by the driver, the effect of these systems is reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%