2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drip Fertigation in Vegetable Crops for Enhancing Productivity and Resource Use Efficiency: An Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 6 shows that there are significant differences in the Coefficient of manufacture variation and uniformity of flow emitter between GR and Turbo, where surpassed GR emitter values on Turbo emitter values were 0.0175, 0.0541, and 99.45 and 98.31, respectively, when the season first starts. Also, at the season's midpoint, the GR emitter gave the best value was (0.0519), (0.0792), (98.38), and (97.60), and this concurs with [31]. values were inconsistent for both GR and Turbo (point source emitters), possibly due to the fact that there can be no two emitters Two identical manufacturers unless there is a difference in the values of the manufacturing coefficient of variation, this is consistent with [32].…”
Section: Drip Irrigation Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Table 6 shows that there are significant differences in the Coefficient of manufacture variation and uniformity of flow emitter between GR and Turbo, where surpassed GR emitter values on Turbo emitter values were 0.0175, 0.0541, and 99.45 and 98.31, respectively, when the season first starts. Also, at the season's midpoint, the GR emitter gave the best value was (0.0519), (0.0792), (98.38), and (97.60), and this concurs with [31]. values were inconsistent for both GR and Turbo (point source emitters), possibly due to the fact that there can be no two emitters Two identical manufacturers unless there is a difference in the values of the manufacturing coefficient of variation, this is consistent with [32].…”
Section: Drip Irrigation Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Fertigation is considered the solution to this challenge, whereby both water and fertilizers are delivered to crops simultaneously through the irrigation system. Scheduling fertilizer applications on the basis of needs reduces nutrient losses compared to conventional application methods that depend on the soil as a reservoir for nutrients (Priya et al, 2017). The method of fertilizer application also improves the use efficiency of nutrients (Zotarelli et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drip irrigation system typically improves crop yield by 25-30% and saves irrigation water up to 50% relative to traditional irrigation methods (Priya et al 2017, Singh et al 2022. Drip systems not only save irrigation water, but also provide the best management of nutrients applied to the crop (Singh et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%