2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drinking water treatment residual as a ballast to sink Microcystis cyanobacteria and inactivate phosphorus in tropical lake water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from this study showed that spent lime DWTR generated from water softening offers a valuable, low-cost material capable of protecting water bodies from the threat of legacy and other sources of P in stormwater runoff. The results add to the growing number of proposed uses for DWTRs for the purpose of lake restoration, including as a bed for constructed wetlands [43], as a sorbent for flow-through treatment of eutrophic water [44], and as a P sorbing ballast in "flock and lock" treatment [45]. This study also provided valuable long-term data from a full-scale field application, allowing for the determination of true P removal performance under in-situ conditions, rather than laboratory data, which can overestimate performance by orders of magnitude [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The results from this study showed that spent lime DWTR generated from water softening offers a valuable, low-cost material capable of protecting water bodies from the threat of legacy and other sources of P in stormwater runoff. The results add to the growing number of proposed uses for DWTRs for the purpose of lake restoration, including as a bed for constructed wetlands [43], as a sorbent for flow-through treatment of eutrophic water [44], and as a P sorbing ballast in "flock and lock" treatment [45]. This study also provided valuable long-term data from a full-scale field application, allowing for the determination of true P removal performance under in-situ conditions, rather than laboratory data, which can overestimate performance by orders of magnitude [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The present study provides valuable insights into the influence of surface area, pore volume, and heavy metal content on the phosphorus adsorption capacity of MDWTR samples with different particle sizes. The observed increase in surface area, particularly in the MDWTR-S sample, indicates enhanced adsorption capacity compared to the Raw-DWTR, suggesting that modifying the surface area of MDWTR can improve its adsorption efficiency (Kuster, Huser, Thongdamrongtham, et al, 2021). Additionally, the presence of micropores further contributes to the adsorption performance of MDWTR samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…1 ). DWTR was chosen as a representative P-inactivating material owing to its relatively high concentrations of aluminum and iron, which endow it with a high potential in controlling lake internal P pollution ( Kuster et al., 2021 , 2023 ) and have been reported to be mainly in relatively stable forms ( Wang and Jiang, 2016 ). The use of DWTR enabled the elimination of interferences that might arise from the migration of metals from the material to the sediment, as confirmed in the Results and Discussion section.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%