1979
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drinking behaviour in rats treated with isoprenaline, angiotensin II or angiotensin antagonists

Abstract: SUMMARY1. Isoprenaline hydrochloride injected subcutaneously in rats given a choice test of 1-8 % NaCi and water, first induced saline intake which started immediately and was almost concluded in 15 min, followed by a copious water intake. When either saline or water were given in a separate test, saline intake surpassed the water intake in the first 15 min.2. The delay of 15, 30 or 60 min after injection of isoprenaline, 100 jug/kg, before drinking was allowed, significantly reduced saline intake but did not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe this is unlikely, however, especially because of our previous findings that showed only a slight difference in time between water and 1.5% NaCl intakes (no more than 5 min) after injection of Ang II (Daniels et al 2009). It is also notable that after isoprenaline injection, the dipsogenic effects of which require intact AT 1 receptors in the SFO (Krause et al 2008), delaying access to fluid attenuated saline intake, but had no effect on water intake (Chiaraviglio, 1979). Thus, it seems that any delayed response would be more likely to mask desensitization of water intake than of saline intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe this is unlikely, however, especially because of our previous findings that showed only a slight difference in time between water and 1.5% NaCl intakes (no more than 5 min) after injection of Ang II (Daniels et al 2009). It is also notable that after isoprenaline injection, the dipsogenic effects of which require intact AT 1 receptors in the SFO (Krause et al 2008), delaying access to fluid attenuated saline intake, but had no effect on water intake (Chiaraviglio, 1979). Thus, it seems that any delayed response would be more likely to mask desensitization of water intake than of saline intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%