1990
DOI: 10.1190/1.1442765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drilling‐induced isothermal remanent magnetization

Abstract: The recovery of core samples is important in petroleum exploration, mineral exploration, and scientific drilling projects; and often complete orientation of the samples (azimuth and plunge) is desirable. Recovered cores are usually not azimuthally oriented because of the costs associated with deployment and operation of downhole orientation tools. Inexpensive paleomagnetic orientation methods have been used with considerable success in the borehole environment (Van der Voo and Watts, 1978; Kodama, 1984; Bleakl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows a distinct upwards vertical remanent magnetisation orientation *58 from the sample axis and is easily demagnetised with a peak field 520 mT. This behaviour is observed in many samples regardless of geographic position or orientation and is inferred to represent an isothermal remanent magnetisation (IRM) overprint acquired from a spinning magnetised drillcore barrel (Pinto & McWilliams 1990;de Wall & Worm 2001;Musgrave et al 2006). Such IRM overprints can completely replace any in situ NRM directions, and all samples in this study that have measured remanence directions within 208 of the sample axis and peak destructive fields 520 mT are treated as drilling IRM overprints (Figure 19).…”
Section: Natural Remanent Magnetisation Directionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It shows a distinct upwards vertical remanent magnetisation orientation *58 from the sample axis and is easily demagnetised with a peak field 520 mT. This behaviour is observed in many samples regardless of geographic position or orientation and is inferred to represent an isothermal remanent magnetisation (IRM) overprint acquired from a spinning magnetised drillcore barrel (Pinto & McWilliams 1990;de Wall & Worm 2001;Musgrave et al 2006). Such IRM overprints can completely replace any in situ NRM directions, and all samples in this study that have measured remanence directions within 208 of the sample axis and peak destructive fields 520 mT are treated as drilling IRM overprints (Figure 19).…”
Section: Natural Remanent Magnetisation Directionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There is a clear disposition toward high inclinations indicating that the remanence is directed close to the drill core axes. Apart from samples 20/97.0 and 20/97.2 these remanent magnetizations are far too stable to be drilling‐induced remanences (DIR) that are typically aligned with drill core axes as discussed by Pinto and McWilliams [1990]. Furthermore, the stable components are not parallel to the drill hole axis, but lie about 20° from it.…”
Section: Rock Magnetismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b). The remaining segments contain the VRMdi component, having almost vertical inclinations (N80°), a likely result from coring (Pinto and McWilliams 1990) (Fig. 2b).…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%