Drilling down the viable system theories in business, management and accounting: A bibliometric review

Iandolo, Francesca; Vito, Pietro; Loia, Francesca; Fulco, Irene; Calabrese, Mario

doi:10.1002/sres.2731

Cited by 10 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 90 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The cocitation network analysis is one of the most common and efficient tools for accurately characterizing the structure of the intellectual base (Small, 1973). Existing literature has adopted this method to review the intellectual structure of particular scientific fields and their development over time (e.g., K. Chen & Guan, 2011; Feng et al, 2015; Iandolo et al, 2020). Third, from the keyword co‐occurrence network analysis, this paper studies clusters of AI system application research that occur because of assigning nodes in a network based on the relationship between terms (Nazarov & Klarin, 2020).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study structures the collected literature and sorts the subject, author and related citation among the literature systematically. We use the literature review method of scientific measurement of literature, draw the application research map of AI system from the understanding of literature topics and provide scientific landscapes (Iandolo et al, 2020). The approach followed with claws to overcome some limitations embrace traditional narrative, historical and systematic reviews, especially those due to the subjectivity of the scholar (Markoulli et al, 2017; Tranfield et al, 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Applications and development of artificial intelligence system from the perspective of system science: A bibliometric review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the rapid development of big data, 6G, Internet of Things (IoT) and other information and communication technologies (ICTs), artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in new opportunities for more advancements. AI systems are changing the survival and development of human society. This study focuses on the research and application of AI systems within the scientific framework of systems thinking. From scientometrics, this study adopts cocitation analysis and keywords co‐occurrence analysis to sort existing applications of AI system to research network and research overview while giving the current research hotspots of AI system application research. Concurrently, the development trend and direction of AI systems are analysed, and the opportunities and challenges faced are put forward, which lays a foundation for system research in the field of AI systems.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applications and development of artificial intelligence system from the perspective of system science: A bibliometric review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this text, the authors use the VOSviewer tool (Köseoglu et al, 2018 ; Lojo et al, 2019 ; González-Serrano et al, 2020 ; Vega-Muñoz et al, 2020 ) to perform a whole set of analysis of scientometric data about entrepreneurship wellbeing literature. Scientometrics allows us to strengthen systematic reviews (Porter et al, 2002 ), and it has been used recently in the field of Psychology (Caffò et al, 2020 ; Peng et al, 2020 ) and Business (Iandolo et al, 2019 ; Inkizhinov et al, 2021 ); its incorporation of sequential mixed use with PRISMA has also been addressed previously (Kazerani et al, 2017 ; Cavinatto et al, 2019 ; Sott et al, 2020 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a scientometric study regarding entrepreneurship and its relationship with wellbeing. The study presents a systematic review and measures impact and relational character to identify the relevance of countries, research organizations, and authors in the field of entrepreneurial wellbeing. The study poses the following research questions: What is the nature of the evolution of scientific knowledge in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What is the nature of the concentration in terms of geographical distribution and co-authorship level of knowledge production in the entrepreneurial wellbeing field? What are the knowledge trends in knowledge production for entrepreneurial wellbeing literature? The contribution of this research is two-fold. First, in terms of methodology, it contributes study into the use of a more robust approach to search for the scientometric trends about entrepreneurship wellbeing in addition to the PRISMA review tools and the PICOS eligibility criteria. Secondly, the study presents research updates in the search for results for the last 2 years of knowledge production. This upgrade is particularly important in a research field that presents exponential growth, where 2019 and 2020 presented almost double the amount of knowledge production compared to 2017 and 2018.

show abstract

“…Researchers have previously suggested that taking into account the complex nature of management, a mix of diverse theories would better describe its principles (Pindur et al , 1995). Systems theory is an important concept in PM that has yet to receive adequate scholarly attention (Iandolo et al , 2019).…”

Section: Feedbackmentioning

confidence: 99%

Managing the most important asset: a twenty year review on the performance management literature

Justin

Joy

2022

JMH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The three objectives served by this review are to provide readers a limpid insight about the topic performance management (PM), to analyse the latest trends in PM literature and to illustrate the theoretical perspectives. It would be fascinating for the practitioners and researchers to see the latest trends in the PM system, which is not yet covered in previous reviews. The study covers the historical and theoretical perspectives of human resource management practices. We also try to unveil some of the theoretical debates and conflicts regarding the topic. Design/methodology/approach We reviewed 139 studies on PM published within the last 20 years (2000–2020). The method used here is the integrative review method. The criteria used to determine studies are articles from peer-reviewed journals regarding the PM system published between 2000 and 2020. The initial search for studies was conducted using an extensive journal database, and then an intensive reference-based search was also done. Each selected article was coded, themes were identified, and trends for every 5 years were determined. All the articles were analysed and classified based on the methodology used to identify qualitative and quantitative studies. Findings The review concludes that PM literature's emphasis shifted from traditional historical evaluations conducted once or twice a year to forward-looking, feedback-enriched PM systems. By segregating the studies into 5-year periods, we could extract five significant trends that prevailed in the PM literature from 2000 to 2020: reactions to PM system, factors that influence PM system, quality of rating sources, evaluating the PM system and types of the PM system. The review ends with a discussion of practical implications and avenues for future research. Research limitations/implications It is equally a limitation and strength of this paper that we conducted a review of 139 articles to cover the whole works in PM literature during the last 20 years. The study could not concentrate on any specific PM theme, such as exploring employee outcomes or organizational outcomes. Likewise, the studies on public sector and non-profit organizations are excluded from this review, which constitutes a significant share of PM literature. Another significant limitation is that the selected articles are classified only based on their methodology; further classification based on different themes and contexts can also be done. Originality/value The study is an original review of the PM literature to identify the latest trends in the field.

show abstract

Drilling down the viable system theories in business, management and accounting: A bibliometric review

Cited by 10 publications

References 90 publications

Applications and development of artificial intelligence system from the perspective of system science: A bibliometric review

Applications and development of artificial intelligence system from the perspective of system science: A bibliometric review

A Scientometric Systematic Review of Entrepreneurial Wellbeing Knowledge Production

Managing the most important asset: a twenty year review on the performance management literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About