2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10120-016-0630-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drill needle aspiration biopsy for submucosal tumors in an experimental study

Abstract: Background and aimsEUS-guided FNA biopsy has been widely performed to aid in the diagnosis of submucosal tumors (SMTs). However, in cases of small tumors, the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA is poor. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a new needle for the diagnosis. We developed a device with a new mechanism that we refer to as a drill needle aspiration biopsy (DNAB). The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of DNAB in resected gastric SMT specimens.MethodsA drill needle with a sharp tip and wide ditch was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, EUS-FNA for a subepithelial hypoechoic solid mass of < 1 cm is technically difficult using a standard EUS-FNA scope; thus, EUS-FNA is recommended for masses of > 1 cm[ 56 , 57 ]. However, forward-viewing and curved linear-array echoendoscopes [ 58 ] and drill needles[ 59 ] have recently been developed and are expected to improve the diagnostic rate of small SELs. The rate of adverse events associated with EUS-FNA using a 22-gauge needle is reportedly close to 0[ 54 - 56 ].…”
Section: Tumor Tissue Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, EUS-FNA for a subepithelial hypoechoic solid mass of < 1 cm is technically difficult using a standard EUS-FNA scope; thus, EUS-FNA is recommended for masses of > 1 cm[ 56 , 57 ]. However, forward-viewing and curved linear-array echoendoscopes [ 58 ] and drill needles[ 59 ] have recently been developed and are expected to improve the diagnostic rate of small SELs. The rate of adverse events associated with EUS-FNA using a 22-gauge needle is reportedly close to 0[ 54 - 56 ].…”
Section: Tumor Tissue Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive endoscopic tissue acquisition to obtain a higher tissue volume was recently developed and clinically applied[ 56 - 59 ]. Various endoscopic tissue-obtaining methods using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques or endoscopic snare resection techniques significantly increase the diagnostic yield when compared with standard forceps biopsy; the reported diagnostic rates range from 85% to 94%[ 61 - 64 ].…”
Section: Tumor Tissue Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Forward-viewing, curved linear-array, and drill needles are expected to improve the diagnostic rate for small SELs [56,68]. EUS-FNA using Forward-viewing EUS is safe and feasible for small SELs, and a method with a cap device and suction is more useful.…”
Section: Diagnostic Yield Of Eus-fna/bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massive studies have already been published regarding the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNAB. 22 - 56 A meta-analysis published in 2016 reports that EUS-guided sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions is safe, but has a moderate diagnostic ability (59.9%) regardless of techniques of FNA/FNB/Tru-Cut needle biopsy or the needle diameter used for puncture. 57 Conversely, a successive meta-analysis reveals that sampling ability of FNA (80.6%) is significantly lower to that of FNB (94.9%), but increase with the help of rapid on-site evaluation.…”
Section: Eus-guided Fine-needle Aspiration/biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%