2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drill geometry and operating effects when cutting small diameter holes in CFRP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
85
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
9
85
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the effect of increase in cutting speed is more significant on the peel-up delamination than the push-down delamination, as shown in Figure 7. This quantitative interpretation of peel-up and push-down delamination with varying cutting speed is equivalent to the microscopic analysis (see Figure 6) and is also found in strong agreement in similar studies [11][12][13]27,39,57]. In Figure 7, the least peel-up and push-down delamination are recorded for 9000 rpm and 6000 rpm, respectively.…”
Section: Delamination Factor (F D )supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, the effect of increase in cutting speed is more significant on the peel-up delamination than the push-down delamination, as shown in Figure 7. This quantitative interpretation of peel-up and push-down delamination with varying cutting speed is equivalent to the microscopic analysis (see Figure 6) and is also found in strong agreement in similar studies [11][12][13]27,39,57]. In Figure 7, the least peel-up and push-down delamination are recorded for 9000 rpm and 6000 rpm, respectively.…”
Section: Delamination Factor (F D )supporting
confidence: 88%
“…However on push-out, contribution percentages of both of these cutting parameters were nearly the same under different tool geometries. For small drills, the study (Shyha et al 2009) used an ANOVA analysis (Montgomery 2009) (with α=5 %) using six input parameters. For the entry delamination, the drill type was found to be the only significant parameter, with no influence from cutting parameters.…”
Section: Motivation Of the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, cutting speed has shown some slight influence on the cutting force. Instead, it has been shown that the feed rate is much more influential on both damage generation (delamination) and thrust force during drilling of composites (Shyha et al 2009;Davim and Reis 2003). As another cutting parameter, variation of the point angle of the drill bit has shown different results on the generation of delamination and cutting force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such techniques need to cope with the water treatment, acoustic noise hazards and abrasive slurry disposal. In addition, they introduce moisture absorption and abrasive penetration of the cut surfaces [6]. Delamination and abrasive embedment between plies are also of major concern during AWJ machining of composites [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as laser machining of CFRP composite is based on the interaction of a laser beam with at least two different materials with large material property differences, defects that are thermal in origin, such as HAZ, charring, matrix recession and delamination, are generated which are major obstacles in advancing laser machining of CFRP composites [3]. Among these defects HAZs may damage the structural properties of the composite materials [6]. Consequently, it is considered as a critical quality parameter in assessing the quality of the laser cutting of CFRP composites in this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%