Drifting to oblivion? Rapid genetic differentiation in an endangered lizard following habitat fragmentation and drought

Abstract

Aim The frequency and severity of habitat alterations and disturbance are predicted to increase in upcoming decades, and understanding how disturbance affects population integrity is paramount for adaptive management. Although rarely is population genetic sampling conducted at multiple time points, pre‐ and post‐disturbance comparisons may provide one of the clearest methods to measure these impacts. We examined how genetic properties of the federally threatened Coachella Valley fringe‐toed lizard (Uma inornata) responded to severe drought and habitat fragmentation across its range. Location Coachella Valley, California, USA. Methods We used 11 microsatellites to examine population genetic structure and diversity in 1996 and 2008, before and after a historic drought. We used Bayesian assignment methods and F‐statistics to estimate genetic structure. We compared allelic richness across years to measure loss of genetic diversity and employed approximate Bayesian computing methods and heterozygote excess tests to explore the recent demographic history of populations. Finally, we compared effective population size across years and to abundance estimates to determine whether diversity remained low despite post‐drought recovery. Results Genetic structure increased between sampling periods, likely as a result of population declines during the historic drought of the late 1990s–early 2000s, and habitat loss and fragmentation that precluded post‐drought genetic rescue. Simulations supported recent demographic declines in 3 of 4 main preserves, and in one preserve, we detected significant loss of allelic richness. Effective population sizes were generally low across the range, with estimates ≤100 in most sites. Main conclusions Fragmentation and drought appear to have acted synergistically to induce genetic change over a short time frame. Progressive deterioration of connectivity, low Ne and measurable loss of genetic diversity suggest that conservation efforts have not maintained the genetic integrity of this species. Genetic sampling over time can help evaluate population trends to guide management.

Trapped within the city: integrating demography, time since isolation and population‐specific traits to assess the genetic effects of urbanization

“…Despite the role of past declines in contemporary N e , the influence of demographic history on genetic diversity and structure, as tested through regression modelling in our study, is not as clear as in other studies (e.g. Spurgin et al 2014;Gonzalez-Quevedo et al 2015;Funk et al 2016;Vandergast et al 2016). Both variables derived from VarEff (MG and POST) had low relative importance.…”

“…; Vandergast et al . ). Both variables derived from VarEff (MG and POST) had low relative importance.…”

Extreme streams: species persistence and genomic change in montane insect populations across a flooding gradient

“…; Vandergast et al . ) have generally found evidence for rapid genetic change, including loss of genetic variation, changes in allele frequencies and increased gene flow. However, previous studies typically focused on a single species or populations, precluding comparisons of genetic consequences across species and across a disturbance gradient (but see Franks et al .…”

“…Steinfartz et al 2007;Plath et al 2010;Suarez et al 2012). Studies of population responses to fire (Dolan et al 2008;Vicente et al 2013;Shohami & Nathan 2014) and drought (Fauvelot et al 2006a,b;Franks et al 2016;Vandergast et al 2016) have generally found evidence for rapid genetic change, including loss of genetic variation, changes in allele frequencies and increased gene flow. However, previous studies typically focused on a single species or populations, precluding comparisons of genetic consequences across species and across a disturbance gradient (but see Franks et al 2016).…”

More grist for the mill? Species delimitation in the genomic era and its implications for conservation

“…Genetic structure has been observed to considerably decrease among brown bear populations (Ursus arctos) in just 1.5 generations (Hagen et al 2015), and genetic structure substantially increased over only 11 years (approx. five generations) in Coachella Valley fringe-toed lizards (Uma inornata; Vandergast et al 2016). These examples are not intended to demonstrate that speciation does not occur over short time periods, but simply that genetic divergence and population structure may be highly transient, which many people would argue should not be the case for speciation.…”