2014
DOI: 10.3390/s141223230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drift Removal for Improving the Accuracy of Gait Parameters Using Wearable Sensor Systems

Abstract: Accumulated signal noise will cause the integrated values to drift from the true value when measuring orientation angles of wearable sensors. This work proposes a novel method to reduce the effect of this drift to accurately measure human gait using wearable sensors. Firstly, an infinite impulse response (IIR) digital 4th order Butterworth filter was implemented to remove the noise from the raw gyro sensor data. Secondly, the mode value of the static state gyro sensor data was subtracted from the measured data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in a non-racing contest or in laboratory tests more accurate kinematic measurements can be obtained using technologies that are already well-assessed in clinical environment e.g. electrogoniometers [27], [28], inertial sensors [29] or marker stereophotogrammetric analysis [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in a non-racing contest or in laboratory tests more accurate kinematic measurements can be obtained using technologies that are already well-assessed in clinical environment e.g. electrogoniometers [27], [28], inertial sensors [29] or marker stereophotogrammetric analysis [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The front-end component of wearable systems is a wide variety of wearable sensors, which can be used to measure all kinds of physiological parameters, such as body temperature [10,11], myoelectricity [12], heart rate [13], and blood glucose [14]. They are also used for human motion detection, such as acceleration [15], muscle ductility [6,16], and foot pressure [17,18]; as well as environment monitoring, for example, position coordinates [19], temperature [20,21], humidity [22,23], and atmospheric pressure [24]. Different from other functional wearable sensors, strain sensors are attached to the joint or even directly mounted on the muscle for human motion inspection [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This double direct integration can result in an accumulation of drift error giving wrong velocity, wrong position, and wrong distance and therefore wrong step length. In the literature, there are solutions to solve the drift error so that it is possible to integrate twice the raw acceleration data and to measure distance [9,15]. By integration, the typical percentages of error over the walking distance are between 2.5% and 5.0% [16].…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%