2013
DOI: 10.1080/02331888.2013.863888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drift parameter estimation for fractional Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process of the second kind

Abstract: Abstract. Fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process of the second kind (fOU2) is solution of the Langevin equation dXt = −θXt dt+dY , we prove that the least squares estimator θT introduced in [[7], Statist. Probab. Lett. 80, no. 11-12, 1030Lett. 80, no. 11-12, -1038, provides a consistent estimator. Moreover, using central limit theorem for multiple Wiener integrals, we prove asymptotic normality of the estimator valid for the whole range H ∈ ( 1 2 , 1).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, as long as one can compute λ f 2 ,n (Z (1) ) and relate it to a parameter of interest, this improvement allows one to take advantage of the best rate of convergence, that of Berry-Esséen order. A study of one example of what it means to extract a parameter from λ f 2 ,n (Z (1) ) is given in Section 6.3.3, for the fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Arguably, as long as one can compute λ f 2 ,n (Z (1) ) and relate it to a parameter of interest, this improvement allows one to take advantage of the best rate of convergence, that of Berry-Esséen order. A study of one example of what it means to extract a parameter from λ f 2 ,n (Z (1) ) is given in Section 6.3.3, for the fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that in [14], the full LS estimator relies on an unobservable Skorohod integral, and the authors proposed a modified version of this estimator which can be computed based on in-fill asymptotics; however, this modified estimator bears no immediate relation to an LS one (see [13] for examples of what constitutes a discretization of an LS estimator for fBm models, and for a comparison with MLE methods, which coincide with LS methods if and only if H = 1/2). In the ergodic case, the statistical inference for several fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (fOU) models via LS methods was recently developed in the papers [14], [1], [2], [13], [15], [6], [21]. The case of non-ergodic fOU process of the first kind and of the second kind can be found in [3], [11] and [12] respectively.…”
Section: Context and General Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A typical example of such a process is the fractional Brownian motion with Hurst parameter H > 1/2. In that case, any α can be chosen in (1/2, H), and g can be any process with the same regularity as the fBm, and thus with β = α; this enables a stochastic calculus immediately, in which no "Itô"-type correction terms occur, owing to (1). For instance, for any Lipshitz non-random function g, this integration-by-parts formula holds for any a.s. Hölder-continuous Gaussian process f , since then α > 0 and β = 1.…”
Section: The Young Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu and Nualart [15] obtained least squares estimation (hereafter LSE) for the fractional OrnsteinUhlenbeck process and proposed the asymptotic normality of LSE using Malliavin calculus. More recently, there has been increased interest in studying asymptotic properties of LSE for the drift parameter in the univariate case with fractional processes (see, Azmoodeh and Morlanes [16]; Cheng et al [17]). Moreover, Xiao and Yu [18] and Xiao and Yu [19] considered the LSE in fractional Vasicek models in the stationary case, the explosive case, and the null recurrent case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%