1986
DOI: 10.1093/jee/79.2.459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drift Comparisons Between Aerial and Ground Orchard Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Employing our GIS-based system, we combined PUR data, land use maps, and geocoded address information [26, 28] to produce estimates of pesticide exposure within a 500-m radius buffer around participants’ occupational and residential addresses as suggested in previous literature [2931]. A technical discussion of our GIS-based approach is provided elsewhere, here we briefly summarize the data sources and exposure modeling process [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing our GIS-based system, we combined PUR data, land use maps, and geocoded address information [26, 28] to produce estimates of pesticide exposure within a 500-m radius buffer around participants’ occupational and residential addresses as suggested in previous literature [2931]. A technical discussion of our GIS-based approach is provided elsewhere, here we briefly summarize the data sources and exposure modeling process [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…proximity to pesticides at distances < 1 mi (1,609 m). Yet some dispersion studies suggest that pesticides are measurable only at considerably smaller distances of ≤ 500 m from the application site (Chester and Ward 1984;Frost and Ware 1970;MacCollom et al 1986;Woods et al 2001). Thus, exposure misclassification may occur if the drift range of an applied pesticide is considerably less than one 1 mi.…”
Section: Historical Pesticide Exposure In California Using Pesticide mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pesticides applied from the air or ground have been observed to drift from their intended treatment sites, with measurable concentrations detected in the air and in plants and animals several hundred meters away (Chester and Ward 1984;Currier et al 1982;Frost and Ware 1970;MacCollom et al 1986;Woods et al 2001). Herbicides transported downwind can cause unintended damage to crops (Byass and Lake 1977), and acute pesticide poisonings have been observed in communities downwind from agricultural fields after applications (Ames et al 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pesticides applied from the air or ground may drift from their intended treatment sites, such that there are measurable concentrations of pesticides detected in the air, in plants, and in animals up to several hundred meters from application sites. [25][26][27][28] Thus, alternative methods of estimating exposures in rural communities are sorely needed, but accurate exposure assessment may be particularly challenging. Geographic Information System (GIS)-based methods of assessing exposures to pesticides have become popular in recent years and may prove to be an effective solution to this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%