2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4994327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drift and separation in collisionality gradients

Abstract: We identify a single-particle drift resulting from collisional interactions with a background species, in the presence of a collisionality gradient and background net flow. We analyze this drift in different limits, showing how it reduces to the well known impurity pinch for high-Z i impurities. We find that in the low-temperature, singly-ionized limit, the magnitude of the drift becomes mass-dependent and energy-dependent. By solving for the resulting diffusion-advection motion, we propose a mass-separation s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 1) can be derived from the condition that the frictional forces between these two species vanish (i.e., that there is no relative velocity). This derivation has been done previously in both the fluid picture [36] and the single-particle picture [37]. Here we will briefly replicate and extend the argument in the fluid picture, allowing for an additional species-dependent external potential Φ s with a gradient parallel to that of the pressure.…”
Section: Derivation Of Generalized Pinchmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…( 1) can be derived from the condition that the frictional forces between these two species vanish (i.e., that there is no relative velocity). This derivation has been done previously in both the fluid picture [36] and the single-particle picture [37]. Here we will briefly replicate and extend the argument in the fluid picture, allowing for an additional species-dependent external potential Φ s with a gradient parallel to that of the pressure.…”
Section: Derivation Of Generalized Pinchmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In the existing literature, Eqs. ( 1) and (2) have been derived from fluid models [1,5,8], using a jump-moment formalism [2], by solving kinetic equations [4], and from a single-particle perspective [7]. In all of these cases, the resulting expression is understood as a condition for the steady state of some particular model for the timeevolution of the plasma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mapping is described implicitly by Eqs. (6), (7), (8), (9), and (43). Problems of this kind are not trivial [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], though in some cases it is possible to read off self-consistent solutions.…”
Section: Constructing a Distribution Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such charge extraction would create a radial electric field in the magnetized plasma, resulting in E×B rotation. Driving E×B rotation, and in particular sheared rotation, is useful in a variety of ways for plasma control; it can suppress both large-scale instabilities [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] and small-scale turbulence [33][34][35][36][37] , increase the confinement of mirror plasmas via centrifugal forces [38][39][40] , and even be exploited in a variety of plasma mass separation schemes [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] . Thus, rotation drive via alpha channeling would be an extremely useful tool to have in the plasma control toolbox.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%