2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dressing percentage and its relationship with some components of the fifth quarter in Portuguese cattle breeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
12
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the breed differences for cod fat, which represented about 0.3% of the carcass, are certainly insufficient to explain the variations in dressing percentage. The lower dressing percentage could also be related with SW, which is in agreement with the results of Jones et al (1985) and Simões et al (2005). Those authors reported that the alimentary tract and the hide account for 74% of the variation in dressing percentage.…”
Section: Carcass Traitssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the breed differences for cod fat, which represented about 0.3% of the carcass, are certainly insufficient to explain the variations in dressing percentage. The lower dressing percentage could also be related with SW, which is in agreement with the results of Jones et al (1985) and Simões et al (2005). Those authors reported that the alimentary tract and the hide account for 74% of the variation in dressing percentage.…”
Section: Carcass Traitssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Carcasses from Alentejana bulls had higher dressing percentage than those from Barrosã bulls (P b 0.05). Usually, dressing percentage is related to finishing degree, amount of visceral fat and gut fill (Simões, Mira, Lemos, & Mendes, 2005). Jones, Rompala, and Jeremiah (1985) suggested that visceral fat could partially account for the differences in dressing percentage.…”
Section: Carcass Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies concerning these two kinds of local autochthonous bovines found an influence of slaughter season, sex and animal age on the fatty acid composition (Brígido et al, 2004;Costa et al, 2006;da Silva, Lemos, Monteiro & Portugal, 1998;Prates, Quaresma, Bessa, Fontes, & Alfaia, 2006;Simõ es & Mendes, 2003;Simõ es & Mira, 2002;Simõ es, Mira, Lemos, & Mendes, 2005). However, this kind of information is usually not given when meat is purchased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher dressing percentage of the LIM breed was also observed by Chambaz et al (2003) and Sañudo et al (2004). However, there was no difference in dressing percentage of SIMcompared with the local cattle breeds, which may be due to its higher fifth quartervalues (Simões et al, 2005).…”
Section: Effect Of Breed On Carcass Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 77%