2013
DOI: 10.1142/s0218863513500410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dressed Quantum Graphs With Optical Nonlinearities Approaching the Fundamental Limit

Abstract: We dress bare quantum graphs with finite delta function potentials and calculate optical nonlinearities that are found to match the fundamental limits set by potential optimization. We show that structures whose first hyperpolarizability is near the maximum are well described by only three states, the so-called three-level Ansatz, while structures with the largest second hyperpolarizability require four states. We analyze a very large set of configurations for graphs with quasi-quadratic energy spectra and sho… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy difference between the ground and first excited state, E 10 , sets a fundamental limit on the electric polarizability and first hyperpolarizability. These limits have been corroborated by experiment [12], potential optimization [13][14][15][16][17], and calculations on quantum graphs [18][19][20][21] though a recent Monte Carlo study utilizing filtered sampling suggests that these limits may be an overestimate by approximately 30% [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The energy difference between the ground and first excited state, E 10 , sets a fundamental limit on the electric polarizability and first hyperpolarizability. These limits have been corroborated by experiment [12], potential optimization [13][14][15][16][17], and calculations on quantum graphs [18][19][20][21] though a recent Monte Carlo study utilizing filtered sampling suggests that these limits may be an overestimate by approximately 30% [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The Hamiltonian operator on E(Γ) consists of the following unidimensional differential operators defined on each edge e s [19,161] (the dressed case) Here, V e s (x e s ) is the potential (usually assumed to be non-negative and smooth) in the interval 0 < x e s < ℓ e s . Different works have considered the above Hamiltonian for non-vanishing potentials (for instance, see [43,44,116,137,[162][163][164][165]). However, in the literature, even in papers discussing quantum chaos [37-39, 47, 166], it is usual to have for any e s that V e s = 0 (the case we assume in this review).…”
Section: {γ(V E) Hamiltonian Operator H On E(γ) Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of the δ functions or prongs creates a giant enhancement of the nonlinear optical response due to a effect known as phase disruption of the lowest eigenfunctions of the graph [84]. This class of graphs has the optimum topology for nonlinear optics [111][112][113]. Table II presents a compilation of results for the class of graphs depicted in Figure 5.…”
Section: Quantum Graph Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…γ + is the value of the second hyperpolarizability's x-diagonal component when the graph is rotated to the position maximizing it. (γ − is the minimum value upon rotation [111]. were non-interacting, however, but models accounted for the Fermion properties of electrons in assembling the eigenstates.…”
Section: Quantum Graph Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%