Reparation of moral damages is the most sensitive matter of civil liability, and perhaps of all private law. It is an area of regulation that highlights, less the virtues of the law, but especially, their vulnerabilities, because no matter how advanced the means at its disposal, they cannot offer relational solutions, for the reinstatement of the "instatuquoante" victim. They concern values of the human personality, which are, by definition, subjective, and therefore not susceptible to the specific standardization of legal normality. Or, if this is the case, can we still talk about the "repair" of moral damages according to the same rules applicable to patrimonial damages?