2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04259.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dreaming during anaesthesia in children: incidence, nature and associations

Abstract: SummaryIn previous studies, the incidence of dreaming during anaesthesia in children was reported to be between 9.7% and 19%. These limited studies were performed over 15 years ago using outmoded anaesthetic techniques. No recent studies have examined the nature of dreaming or its impact on children. In this prospective cohort study of 864 children, we determined the incidence, nature, predictors and behavioural consequences of children who reported dreaming during anaesthesia. Children aged 5-12 years who had… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(77 reference statements)
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we sought to detect children with clear explicit memory of the sheep sound so that we could exclude them from analysis. The study was not designed primarily to assess dreaming or awareness; however, our observed overall incidence of dreaming (7.3%) was similar to that reported by Huang et al, 22 (10.4%) and the incidence of "possible awareness" was similar to the "preadjudicator reports" in other studies (1.5 7 to 2.2% 5 ). Importantly, there was no independent adjudication of awareness and only one interview was conducted; thus, we cannot comment on the "true" rate of awareness in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this study, we sought to detect children with clear explicit memory of the sheep sound so that we could exclude them from analysis. The study was not designed primarily to assess dreaming or awareness; however, our observed overall incidence of dreaming (7.3%) was similar to that reported by Huang et al, 22 (10.4%) and the incidence of "possible awareness" was similar to the "preadjudicator reports" in other studies (1.5 7 to 2.2% 5 ). Importantly, there was no independent adjudication of awareness and only one interview was conducted; thus, we cannot comment on the "true" rate of awareness in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A subpopulation of children in this cohort was also assessed for awareness and dreaming under anesthesia. These data have been published elsewhere (23,24).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subpopulation of children in this cohort was also assessed for awareness and dreaming under anesthesia. These data have been published elsewhere (6,7).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%