2016
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dream to Predict? REM Dreaming as Prospective Coding

Abstract: The dream as prediction seems inherently improbable. The bizarre occurrences in dreams never characterize everyday life. Dreams do not come true! But assuming that bizarreness negates expectations may rest on a misunderstanding of how the predictive brain works. In evolutionary terms, the ability to rapidly predict what sensory input implies—through expectations derived from discerning patterns in associated past experiences—would have enhanced fitness and survival. For example, food and water are essential fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 221 publications
(251 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is accumulating evidence indicating that cognitive bizarreness is just “the other side of the coin” of a more fluid and flexible cognitive processing during REMS compared to non-REMS (NREMS) and waking state [ 49 ]. In this vein, dreaming has been conceptualized as off-line, unconscious thought-in-progress in which associative mechanisms and visual imagery are less tightly constrained by prefrontal cortical control mechanisms, and hence are less strictly confined by logical reasoning but predominantly driven by underlying emotions [ 50 - 53 ]. Compared to waking mentation, therefore, dreaming has the cognitive advantage of facilitating creative insight – the forming of associative elements into new image-based combinations which lead to greater understanding and which are useful to solve a problem [ 54 ].…”
Section: Dreamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is accumulating evidence indicating that cognitive bizarreness is just “the other side of the coin” of a more fluid and flexible cognitive processing during REMS compared to non-REMS (NREMS) and waking state [ 49 ]. In this vein, dreaming has been conceptualized as off-line, unconscious thought-in-progress in which associative mechanisms and visual imagery are less tightly constrained by prefrontal cortical control mechanisms, and hence are less strictly confined by logical reasoning but predominantly driven by underlying emotions [ 50 - 53 ]. Compared to waking mentation, therefore, dreaming has the cognitive advantage of facilitating creative insight – the forming of associative elements into new image-based combinations which lead to greater understanding and which are useful to solve a problem [ 54 ].…”
Section: Dreamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, during REM a reduced hippocampal input to neocortex is coupled with a massive neural activity (driven by ponto-geniculo-occipital waves) that can randomly activate cortical representations. This highly active state might allow scanning memories to find meaningful regularities between events, and to generate and strengthen new abstractions between both cortical representations activated during the NREM and other, apparently not related, representations (Lewis et al 2018;Llewellyn 2016). Moreover, it has been proposed that during REM the sleeping brain tends to simulate and rehearse fictive scenarios to produce prediction errors and, therefore, refine (i.e., update) the internal models before the next wakefulness (Friston et al 2017b;Hobson et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis that internal model updating mainly (but not exclusively) occurs during REM sleep has been also suggested by theoretical work (Llewellyn, 2015). In this work, Llewellyn (2015) also proposed a distinction between predictive and prospective coding.…”
Section: Review Of Lutz Et Almentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The hypothesis that internal model updating mainly (but not exclusively) occurs during REM sleep has been also suggested by theoretical work (Llewellyn, 2015). In this work, Llewellyn (2015) also proposed a distinction between predictive and prospective coding. Predictive coding refers to the anticipation of upcoming input during wake based on a specific ongoing event, whereas prospective coding creates off-line probabilistic patterns (i.e., schema of plausible sequences of events created during sleep or resting periods) based on past events.…”
Section: Review Of Lutz Et Almentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation