2004
DOI: 10.1037/1053-0797.14.2-3.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dream sharing as social practice.

Abstract: Among the small communities of hunter-gatherers, dream sharing is widespread. The entities within their world (animals, plants, etc.) were regarded as sentient, responsive beings, with whom discourse could be established via dreams, visions, and trances, together with song, dance, and ritual. Their temporal orientation was mythic/ paradigmatic (kairotic) rather than chronologic, so that creation could continually be recurring. In critical contrast, high Western intellectual thought-post-Reformation and post-E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…62-66;Laughlin, McManus & d'Aquili, 1990, p. 293). In modern materialistic, technocratic societies, children are typically taught to disattend to their dreams and to focus on waking interactions with the external physical and social world (see Mageo, 2003b;Wax, 2004). Children are taught from infancy that dreams are not real-that they are a fiction ("just a dream")-and that they just happen for no apparent reason and can be ignored.…”
Section: -William James the Principles Of Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…62-66;Laughlin, McManus & d'Aquili, 1990, p. 293). In modern materialistic, technocratic societies, children are typically taught to disattend to their dreams and to focus on waking interactions with the external physical and social world (see Mageo, 2003b;Wax, 2004). Children are taught from infancy that dreams are not real-that they are a fiction ("just a dream")-and that they just happen for no apparent reason and can be ignored.…”
Section: -William James the Principles Of Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are refreshing exceptions, of course. Murray L. Wax (1998Wax ( , 2004) has thought about dreaming in both its neurobiological and its sociocultural contexts and has noted that modern neuroscience removes the experience of dreaming from the limited context of the intimate social relations and ethos of the dreamer and re-frames dreaming as a cognitive process:…”
Section: Special Dreamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A keen interest in dreams among some hunter-gatherer societies is exemplified by the practice of dream sharing (Wax, 2004). Dreams are sometimes recounted as experiences from another, parallel existence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dreaming and other states of non-waking or altered states of consciousness may in fact be normal, yet extraordinary ways of appreciating life patterning within a unitary appreciative perspective (Cowling, 2001;Watson, 1999). Dreams can be collective, communal, and emancipatory, as well as individual (Jung, 1964;Wax, 2004). While individual dreaming has been extensively studied in the literature (Harris & Lane, 2003), the participatory nature of dreaming as a unitary phenomenon is limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%