2018
DOI: 10.1101/432567
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

dream: Powerful differential expression analysis for repeated measures designs

Abstract: Large-scale transcriptome studies with multiple samples per individual are widely used to study disease biology. Yet current methods for differential expression are inadequate for cross-individual testing for these repeated measures designs. Most problematic, we observe across multiple datasets that current methods can give reproducible false positive findings that are driven by genetic regulation of gene expression, yet are unrelated to the trait of interest. Here we introduce a statistical software package, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gene raw counts were normalized by TMM methods in edgeR (Robinson et al, 2010). To identify age-related differentially expressed genes, we used mixed effect linear regression model for global analysis, and linear regression model for tissue-specific analyses using DREAM (Hoffman & Roussos, 2020). For the global analysis, we set tissue and sex as fixed factors, age as a covariate and individual as a random effect.…”
Section: Bulk Rna Sequences Data Resources and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene raw counts were normalized by TMM methods in edgeR (Robinson et al, 2010). To identify age-related differentially expressed genes, we used mixed effect linear regression model for global analysis, and linear regression model for tissue-specific analyses using DREAM (Hoffman & Roussos, 2020). For the global analysis, we set tissue and sex as fixed factors, age as a covariate and individual as a random effect.…”
Section: Bulk Rna Sequences Data Resources and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentially expressed genes were identified using dream statistical model available within variancePartition package [26], considering a significance level threshold of FDR ≤ 0.05. Weighted-gene co-expression network analysis was performed separately for NPC and Neurons using WGCNA package from R [27] (Supplementary Material).…”
Section: Differential Expression and Weighted-gene Correlation Networmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we have multiple clones for each individual, we then applied a statistical model that accounts for a repeated measurement design [26] to properly control the false discovery rate in the identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between ASD and control neuronal cells. In NPC, we did not identify any gene with differential expression that reached statistical significance (Supplementary Table S6), while in neurons, we found 20 genes with significant expression dysregulation (multiple testing corrected p < 0.05, Supplementary Table S7).…”
Section: Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Altered Gene Expression In Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the proposed method (FMT in LMM) to Limma [12] and Dream methods [13]. The Limma method calculates a common correlation coefficient between technical replicates for all genes to account for the correlation of repeated measurements within subjects in a linear fixed-effects model setting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limma method [12] incorporates correlation estimates of replicates in linear modeling, but it enforces a common correlation for all genes, which works well for within-array replicates as originally planned, but is risky for between-array replicates. Dream method [13] tries to solve this issue in the setting of linear mixed-effects models. This method shrinks residual variances only, while variance estimates of random effects are scaled to residual variances before and after shrinkage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%