2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-5961(00)00095-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dream or reality: providing universal access to basic telecommunications in Nigeria?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2001, when the Global System of Mobile (GSM) Communication was introduced in Nigeria, the telephone industry was extremely stagnant. With a population of over 100 million there were around 500,000 landlines in use and over 10 million Nigerians queuing for an installation – with an average queue time ranging from 8 to 10 years (Obadare, 2004: 10; Onwumechili, 2001: 223ff, 2005: 24ff). The introduction of GSM was an enormous leap, and in 2012, there were around 100 million active lines in use (Nigerian Communications Commission, 2012).…”
Section: Rereading the Glories Of Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2001, when the Global System of Mobile (GSM) Communication was introduced in Nigeria, the telephone industry was extremely stagnant. With a population of over 100 million there were around 500,000 landlines in use and over 10 million Nigerians queuing for an installation – with an average queue time ranging from 8 to 10 years (Obadare, 2004: 10; Onwumechili, 2001: 223ff, 2005: 24ff). The introduction of GSM was an enormous leap, and in 2012, there were around 100 million active lines in use (Nigerian Communications Commission, 2012).…”
Section: Rereading the Glories Of Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of funding schemes is only limited by the imaginations of policymakers and the acceptance of governing bodies. Kaserman et al (1990), Wolak (1996), Parsons (1998), Wellenius (2001), Onwumechili (2001) and Research Center for Regulation and Competition (2002) discuss the possibilities for funding and design of universal service programs.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge, however, was "whether the rural-poor of the country will be able to afford cellphone services if it is made available? If they cannot, then the affordable universal access cannot be achieved" [8]. Which thus means that, liberalization and privatization that are said to be the drive to lessen prices and enhance mobile telecommunication services available to users, might not be easily achievable as well.…”
Section: Cost/billing Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%