2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009438406510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dream bizarreness and inner thought.

Abstract: The paper offers a critique of bizarreness studies that compare dreams to real world probability ratios and directed thought processes. as a basis for determining the degree of bizarreness in dreams. It examines two cases from the literature and suggests that dreams are better compared to non-directed, or imaginative waking thought processes, specifically Inner Thought and Speech (or "speech for oneself," in Lev Vygotsky's definition), in which associative mechanisms operate freely hand in hand with (primarily… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bert States has raised this point: when we dream, we do not experience the content of the dream as bizarre; rather, we just accept whatever our brain throws our way as the fact of the matter. 20 A sense of bizarreness emerges as soon as we wake up and compare the dream with our beliefs and expectations about "awake" reality. This implies that dreams are a full-fl edged mode of thinking.…”
Section: Dreaming Research: a Thumbnail Sketchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bert States has raised this point: when we dream, we do not experience the content of the dream as bizarre; rather, we just accept whatever our brain throws our way as the fact of the matter. 20 A sense of bizarreness emerges as soon as we wake up and compare the dream with our beliefs and expectations about "awake" reality. This implies that dreams are a full-fl edged mode of thinking.…”
Section: Dreaming Research: a Thumbnail Sketchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a sense in which "anything goes" during dreaming; hence the much-discussed aspect of "bizarreness" in dreams (e.g. States, 2000). In writing poetry, this simply is not true.…”
Section: Dream Poetry As Dream Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Knudson (2001) observes that the literature on highly significant dreams is filled with references to the bizarreness of their content, but suggests that “unrealistic” might be a better descriptor. States (2000) also objects to the term “bizarre” because dreams follow their own “logic” and can best be thought of as “thoughts-in-process” (p. 179).…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%