2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12223-010-0023-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DRBC agar: a new tool for Candida dubliniensis identification

Abstract: Candida dubliniensis pathogenic species, which shares many phenotypic features with C. albicans, may be misidentified in the microbiology laboratory. The growth on DRBC agar at 25 degrees C was shown to be a new tool for differentiation between C. dubliniensis and C. albicans. All 27 isolates of C. dubliniensis showed in this medium rough colonies (peripheral hyphal fringes) and abundant chlamydospore production, while all 103 isolates of C. albicans showed smooth colonies without fringes or chlamydospores. DR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a useful extension of the available methods for the identification of C. dubliniensis is the recently developed antibody-based latex agglutination test (15), but besides the higher cost of this assay, there remain insufficient data available about how this method performs in a routine laboratory. Several other methods of distinguishing C. dubliniensis from C. albicans using discriminating culture media have been reported (16,17).These tests are simple and cheap but suffer from low standardization due to variations in the composition of media and are not appropriate for direct separation of C. dubliniensis from clinical samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a useful extension of the available methods for the identification of C. dubliniensis is the recently developed antibody-based latex agglutination test (15), but besides the higher cost of this assay, there remain insufficient data available about how this method performs in a routine laboratory. Several other methods of distinguishing C. dubliniensis from C. albicans using discriminating culture media have been reported (16,17).These tests are simple and cheap but suffer from low standardization due to variations in the composition of media and are not appropriate for direct separation of C. dubliniensis from clinical samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%