2008
DOI: 10.1080/09500690701630455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drawings as Representations of Children's Conceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
58
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Ehrle´n (2009) used drawings and interviews to assess knowledge of children (aged 6-9), suggesting that this combined method of assessment gave a better indication of a child's concept of the Earth; however, during the interviews, many children modified their drawings in response to the questions asked (Ehrle´n, 2009). To minimise the complications of assessing knowledge from a drawing that may have been produced using different conceptual frameworks (Ehrle´n, 2009;Luquet, 2001), this study assessed and compared the pre-visit drawing with the post-visit drawing from the same child, and, assuming that the conceptual framework and level of skill of the drawer remained unchanged between the two drawings, then the changes in the content of the drawings relate to the learning that had occurred between the pre-visit drawing and the post-visit drawing, as a result of the visit to the Aquarium. O'Byrne (2009) used pre-and post-teaching drawings to assess children's (aged 6-8) learning about wolves, and these paired drawings gave an insight into children's thinking, with the post-teaching drawings showing a significant refinement in concept.…”
Section: Educational Research and Evaluation 267mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ehrle´n (2009) used drawings and interviews to assess knowledge of children (aged 6-9), suggesting that this combined method of assessment gave a better indication of a child's concept of the Earth; however, during the interviews, many children modified their drawings in response to the questions asked (Ehrle´n, 2009). To minimise the complications of assessing knowledge from a drawing that may have been produced using different conceptual frameworks (Ehrle´n, 2009;Luquet, 2001), this study assessed and compared the pre-visit drawing with the post-visit drawing from the same child, and, assuming that the conceptual framework and level of skill of the drawer remained unchanged between the two drawings, then the changes in the content of the drawings relate to the learning that had occurred between the pre-visit drawing and the post-visit drawing, as a result of the visit to the Aquarium. O'Byrne (2009) used pre-and post-teaching drawings to assess children's (aged 6-8) learning about wolves, and these paired drawings gave an insight into children's thinking, with the post-teaching drawings showing a significant refinement in concept.…”
Section: Educational Research and Evaluation 267mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(3) "Imagine a scientist who is working and draw what you have imagined in the space below." The literature suggests that students' drawings can be used to grasp their points of views only by considering the meaning the students themselves give to their own drawings (Ehrlén, 2009). Therefore, students in the present study were also asked to (4) "describe their drawings in detail and describe what the scientist is doing in their drawings."…”
Section: A Modified Version Of the Draw-a-scientist Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where learners generate and publicly share their representations, they learn by critiquing the clarity and coherence of what they and their peers have drawn (32). These windows into student thinking can serve teachers in diagnostic, formative and summative assessment (33,34) (Fig. S2).…”
Section: Drawing To Communicatementioning
confidence: 99%