2003
DOI: 10.1086/381321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drawing the Line: Hasidic Jews, Eruvim, and the Public Space of Outremont, Quebec

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a socio-demographic survey of the ultra-Orthodox Hasidic communities of Outremont in Montreal (mainly Belz and Satmar Hasidim) identified the problem of poverty and socio-economic jeopardy threatening the future of those communities (Shahar et al 1997). We have studies examining Canadian ultra-Orthodox and Orthodox Jews as test cases for the limits and flexibility of Canadian multiculturalism, notably with regard to the dispute over the eruv in Montreal (Stoker 2003;van Praagh 1996). Other studies focusing on Orthodoxy in Canada have been undertaken with the works of Ira Robinson and Etan Diamond, as well as several studies that have broached distinct sub-topics (Diamond 2000;Levy 2004;Lightman and Shor 2002;Robinson 2007;Sepinwall 2002;Weiser 2007).…”
Section: Religion Culture and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a socio-demographic survey of the ultra-Orthodox Hasidic communities of Outremont in Montreal (mainly Belz and Satmar Hasidim) identified the problem of poverty and socio-economic jeopardy threatening the future of those communities (Shahar et al 1997). We have studies examining Canadian ultra-Orthodox and Orthodox Jews as test cases for the limits and flexibility of Canadian multiculturalism, notably with regard to the dispute over the eruv in Montreal (Stoker 2003;van Praagh 1996). Other studies focusing on Orthodoxy in Canada have been undertaken with the works of Ira Robinson and Etan Diamond, as well as several studies that have broached distinct sub-topics (Diamond 2000;Levy 2004;Lightman and Shor 2002;Robinson 2007;Sepinwall 2002;Weiser 2007).…”
Section: Religion Culture and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It informs much of the literature concerning separation of church and state vs. accommodating an eruv. Researchers covering this question include Stoker (2003), who considers some of the issues raised in the Tenafly case. She contrasts the case of Tenafly, in which it was argued that "permanently affixing religious symbols to public property (in this case, utility poles)," violated the separation of church and state, with other cases that involved other issues.…”
Section: Purimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tended to view Outremont's public image in the same terms as its physical territory, that is, as a substantive, material, and therefore finite entity whose "use" and/or "occupancy" had to be carefully monitored and apportioned. Outremont eruv opposition therefore tended to presume that the proper management of religious and cultural diversity occurs through the privatization of difference by minority members in the interests of protecting a dominant cultural community that is uniquely entitled to mark Outremont's landscape and shape its public image 77 .…”
Section: X Xmentioning
confidence: 99%