2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2021.103518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dramatic attenuation of continental weathering during the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition: Implications for the climatic-oceanic-biological co-evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant decrease of CIA values (from 89 to 70) has been identified during the transition from Liuchapo Formation to Jiumenchong Formation (Figure 3), this shift implies an unusual decline in chemical weathering during the Early Cambrian. Indeed, the abrupt decrease of chemical weathering was comparable with the lower Jiumenchong Formation of the Daotuo section (Zhai et al, 2018), and was supported by a sharp decrease of magnesium and radiogenic strontium isotope values during the Early Cambrian (Li et al, 2013; Mazumdar & Strauss, 2006; Zhang et al, 2021). On the other hand, a gradual increase in CIA values (from 71 to 89) was observed within the Liuchapo Formation (Figure 3), indicating enhanced chemical weathering during the Ediacaran‐Cambrian transition (Nicholas, 1996; Shields, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A significant decrease of CIA values (from 89 to 70) has been identified during the transition from Liuchapo Formation to Jiumenchong Formation (Figure 3), this shift implies an unusual decline in chemical weathering during the Early Cambrian. Indeed, the abrupt decrease of chemical weathering was comparable with the lower Jiumenchong Formation of the Daotuo section (Zhai et al, 2018), and was supported by a sharp decrease of magnesium and radiogenic strontium isotope values during the Early Cambrian (Li et al, 2013; Mazumdar & Strauss, 2006; Zhang et al, 2021). On the other hand, a gradual increase in CIA values (from 71 to 89) was observed within the Liuchapo Formation (Figure 3), indicating enhanced chemical weathering during the Ediacaran‐Cambrian transition (Nicholas, 1996; Shields, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The chemical composition of clastic sedimentary rocks is predominantly regulated by the lithologies of their source, which comprise a distinctive assemblage of sedimentary, igneous, and metamorphic rocks. Trace and rare elements, such as Zirconium (Zr), Thorium (Th), Hafnium (Hf), and Lanthanum (La), remain stable during geological processes like weathering, deposition, and diagenesis (Wang et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2021). Furthermore, these elements exhibit immobility and dissimilar concentrations and/or ratios in various parent rocks (Cullers and Berendsen, 1998).…”
Section: Provenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was not until Cryogenian that eukaryotic marine primary productivity became dominant and consequently, the organic parent materials became diversified (Brocks et al, 2017). In addition, the Mesoproterozoic was characterized by a distinct difference in both the atmosphere, which was low in oxygen (Zhang et al, 2016) and the prevalence of anoxic water bodies, when compared to the Phanerozoic era (Planavsky et al, 2011). On the one hand, the anoxic ocean provides ideal circumstances for organic matter burial, which is comparable to the model of organic carbon accumulation during Cretaceous oceanic anoxic event 2 or organic matter preservation in the black sea (Murray, 1989; Raven et al, 2019; Wagner et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ediacaran biota typically disappears by the Ediacaran/Cambrian transition (particularly in North America) and gives way to the distinctive faunal assemblages of the early Cambrian (Darroch et al 2018; Muscente et al 2019; Bowyer et al 2022). There are many hypotheses concerning the appearance and disappearance of the Ediacaran biota, including changing redox (oxic/anoxic) states in Ediacaran oceans (Sperling et al 2016; Zhang et al 2019), preservational biases caused by unique Ediacaran taphonomy or lack of outcrop (Seilacher 1984; Laflamme et al 2013; Gehling et al 2019; Cuthill 2022), and environmental catastrophe or biotic replacement–driven mass extinction (Darroch et al 2018; Tarhan et al 2018; Zhang et al 2021). All of these proposed hypotheses invoke mechanisms known to exert controls on macroevolutionary trends observed from marine metazoan fossils in the Phanerozoic (Valentine 1969; Raup and Sepkoski 1982; Stanley 2007; Erwin 2008; Alroy 2010; Hannisdal and Peters 2011; Aberhan and Kiessling 2012; and many others).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%