Drainless resection of the submandibular gland with facial vessel preservation: A comparative study

Şahin, Bayram; Esen, Erkan; Başaran, Bora

doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.017

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although several authors have considered the submaxillectomy without drain a safe procedure, leaving or not hemostatic agents before closure in the surgical field [ 7 , 11 – 13 ], the mainstream is use active drains [ 5 , 6 , 14 ]; this was the procedure followed in our patients.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this study, the drain was removed two days after the surgery in a patient with a clear cell metastasis, slightly higher than our mean removal value (1,47 days). One of the determinant factors for hospital stay in the postoperative period of a submaxillectomy is the removal of the drain [ 11 ]. Patients stay at least one day even in those institutions with no postoperative active drain [ 7 , 11 , 12 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the determinant factors for hospital stay in the postoperative period of a submaxillectomy is the removal of the drain [ 11 ]. Patients stay at least one day even in those institutions with no postoperative active drain [ 7 , 11 , 12 ]. Mean hospital stay after a submandibular gland removal ranges from 2 to 3 days [ 11 , 15 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Patients stay at least one day even in those institutions with no postoperative active drain [ 7 , 11 , 12 ]. Mean hospital stay after a submandibular gland removal ranges from 2 to 3 days [ 11 , 15 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Outpatient Submaxillectomy Using Active Drains. Safety of the Procedure and Patient Satisfaction

Marcos

Velasco

Alba-Luengo

2021

J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Outpatient Submaxillectomy Using Active Drains. Safety of the Procedure and Patient Satisfaction

Marcos

Velasco

Alba-Luengo

2021

J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Studies have shown that the use of SurgiGuard 1 after surgery could achieve hemostasis in pigs [19], and that ORC could prevent seroma formation or reduce the volume of postoperative drainage following submandibular gland surgery [20]. ORC has been reported to act as a reconstructive biomaterial to optimize esthetic results after oncoplastic procedures in breast cancer surgery [21][22][23].…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

The efficacy of oxidized regenerated cellulose (SurgiGuard®) in breast cancer patients who undergo total mastectomy with node surgery: A prospective randomized study in 94 patients

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Seromas frequently develop in patients who undergo total mastectomy with node surgery. We aimed to prospectively explore whether use of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC, SurgiGuard®) affects seroma formation after total mastectomy with node surgery (sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)). Materials and methods Ninety four breast cancer patients were enrolled in the study who underwent total mastectomy with ALND or SLNB. The patients were randomized into two groups, one treated with ORC plus closed suction drainage and the other with closed suction drainage alone. Results Mean drainage volume was slightly lower in the ORC group on postoperative day 1 (123 ± 54 vs 143 ± 104 ml), but was slightly higher at all other time points; however, these differences were not significant. Mean total drainage volume in patients treated with ORC plus drainage did not differ from that of patients treated with drainage alone (1134 ± 507 ml vs 1033 ± 643 ml, P = 0.486). Conclusions Use of ORC (SurgiGuard®) did not significantly alter the risk of seroma formation.

show abstract

Persönliche Präferenz, Erfahrung, Intuition und operative Schule dominieren die Verwendung postoperativer Wunddrainagen in der Dermatochirurgie

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Die Verwendung von Drainagesystemen in der Dermatochirurgie erfolgt bislang ohne evidenzbasierte Daten. Indikationen, Komplikationen und Kontraindikationen werden traditionell von Operateur zu Operateur weitergegeben, sind jedoch bisher nicht definiert. Methodik Es wurde eine internetbasierte Umfrage erstellt und unter den Mitgliedern der DGDC e. V. (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Dermatochirurgie e. V.) ausgesandt. Abgefragt wurden das allgemeine Behandlungsverhalten im deutschsprachigen Raum in Bezug auf die Anwendung der Wunddrainage nach dermatologischen Operationen sowie die Nutzungsgewohnheiten und Erfahrungen der Kollegen mit Drainage-assoziierten Komplikationen. Ergebnisse Es haben 12,73 % der angeschriebenen DGDC-Mitglieder den Fragebogen beantwortet. Drainagen werden überwiegend im klinischen Umfeld eingesetzt, es werden alle abgefragten Drainagesysteme verwendet. Ausmaß und Komplexität des Eingriffs sind die wesentlichen Kriterien bei der Indikationsstellung. Der Einsatz von Drainagen ist abhängig vom Alter des Teilnehmers und erfolgt mehrheitlich bei Patienten, bei denen Komplikationen im postoperativen Verlauf erwartet werden (Adipositas, Nikotinabusus, Diabetiker). Diskussion Zusammenfassend verwendet die Mehrzahl der Teilnehmer Wunddrainagen und dies mehrheitlich intuitiv. Einheitliche fixe evidenzbasierte Parameter rund um die Verwendung von Wunddrainagen fehlen. Bei der Beurteilung der Notwendigkeit einer Wunddrainage scheint ein individuell unterschiedlich ausgeprägtes Sicherheitsbedürfnis bei den einen und „eminenzbasiertes“ Handeln bei den anderen Dermatochirurgen eine große Rolle zu spielen.

show abstract

Drainless resection of the submandibular gland with facial vessel preservation: A comparative study

Cited by 5 publications

References 14 publications

Outpatient Submaxillectomy Using Active Drains. Safety of the Procedure and Patient Satisfaction

Outpatient Submaxillectomy Using Active Drains. Safety of the Procedure and Patient Satisfaction

The efficacy of oxidized regenerated cellulose (SurgiGuard®) in breast cancer patients who undergo total mastectomy with node surgery: A prospective randomized study in 94 patients

Persönliche Präferenz, Erfahrung, Intuition und operative Schule dominieren die Verwendung postoperativer Wunddrainagen in der Dermatochirurgie

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About