2018
DOI: 10.1130/b32053.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drainage control of Eocene to Miocene sedimentary records in the southeastern margin of Eurasian Plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latest ‘source‐to‐sink’ path studies in the northern SCS found that the sources of sediments in the region changed greatly during the Eocene to Early Oligocene, the ancient ‘Kontum‐Ying‐Qiong’ river that originated after the uplift of the western SCS was the main factor controlling the sediment source in the northern SCS, and this geological time period was also the time when the sedimentary environment changed the most in the SCS (Shao et al, 2019). Therefore, this research was carried out on the basis of many previous studies, and combining long‐term observational research results on provenance, geochronology, and palaeogeography (Cao, Shao, Qiao, Zhao, & van Hinsbergen, 2018; Chen et al, 2017; Galin, Breitfeld, Hall, & Sevastjanova, 2017; Keenan et al, 2016; Shao et al, 2016, 2018). Regional sedimentary evolution and palinspastic reconstructions were discussed with analysing the disappearance of the Proto‐SCS, the tectonic evolution of the SCS, and the relationship between tectonic evolution and sedimentary evolution, which will help us to better understand the Cenozoic geodynamic history of the SCS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest ‘source‐to‐sink’ path studies in the northern SCS found that the sources of sediments in the region changed greatly during the Eocene to Early Oligocene, the ancient ‘Kontum‐Ying‐Qiong’ river that originated after the uplift of the western SCS was the main factor controlling the sediment source in the northern SCS, and this geological time period was also the time when the sedimentary environment changed the most in the SCS (Shao et al, 2019). Therefore, this research was carried out on the basis of many previous studies, and combining long‐term observational research results on provenance, geochronology, and palaeogeography (Cao, Shao, Qiao, Zhao, & van Hinsbergen, 2018; Chen et al, 2017; Galin, Breitfeld, Hall, & Sevastjanova, 2017; Keenan et al, 2016; Shao et al, 2016, 2018). Regional sedimentary evolution and palinspastic reconstructions were discussed with analysing the disappearance of the Proto‐SCS, the tectonic evolution of the SCS, and the relationship between tectonic evolution and sedimentary evolution, which will help us to better understand the Cenozoic geodynamic history of the SCS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential sediment provenance trends derived from U‐Pb age spectra are shown in Figure 12. We analyzed 27 samples from potential sediment sources (Table S2) to subdivide them into three types: (1) rivers and hinterland areas surrounding the Xisha Trough (Figure 12a) (Cao et al, 2018; Clift et al, 2006; Hoang et al, 2009; Jonell et al, 2016; Yao et al, 2011; Shao et al, 2017; Sun et al, 2009; Wang et al, 2018; Xia et al, 2012; Xu et al, 2008), (2) basement rocks in the Xisha Trough and its corresponding shoulder areas (Figure 12b) (Cao et al, 2015; Cui et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2015; Xu et al, 2014; Zhu et al, 2017), and (3) Eocene and Oligocene sediments from the Pearl River Mouth Basin (Figure 12c) (Shao, Cao, et al, 2017; Shao et al, 2019). Magma addition in the basement of the Xisha Trough has been recorded by Wells XK1 (Zhu et al, 2017), B2, and B3 (Cui et al, 2018).…”
Section: U‐pb Ages From Detrital Zirconsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A compilation of detrital zircon U-Pb age data of the Jurassic to Eocene strata from the northern South China Sea margin and the Jurassic to Miocene strata from the Palawan continental terrane, shown as a summary of sampling information and a list of U-Pb ages of each sample. The original published age data (Chen et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2016;Knittel et al, 2017;Lan et al, 2016;Li et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2017;Padrones et al, 2017;Shao et al, 2016;Shao et al, 2017a;Shao et al, 2018;Shao et al, 2017b;Suggate et al, 2014;Walia et al, 2012;Walia et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2016;Yan et al, 2018a;Yan et al, 2018b;Yui et al, 2012;Zhao, 2015), if available, are filtered with a cutoff criterion of both 10% discordance and 10% uncertainty (1σ). Ages of stratigraphic boundaries followed the International Chronostratigraphic Chart v2018/08.…”
Section: Supplemental Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%