2017 IEEE 3rd International Workshop on High-Performance Interconnection Networks in the Exascale and Big-Data Era (HiPINEB) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/hipineb.2017.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dragonfly+: Low Cost Topology for Scaling Datacenters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar assumption of loss rate can be found in [14]. In fact, latency and traffic traversing through the link have a non-linear relation [15].…”
Section: A Mathematical Optimisation-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar assumption of loss rate can be found in [14]. In fact, latency and traffic traversing through the link have a non-linear relation [15].…”
Section: A Mathematical Optimisation-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, it is non-trivial to model QoS metrics such as loss rate and latency. For instance, the latency of a link depends on the traffic traversing it and the relation between traffic and latency is not linear [15]. Therefore, we cannot model the problem and solve it as an ILP.…”
Section: Thus We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designed for large parallel workloads, Niagara has a low-latency high-bandwidth Mellanox EDR InfiniBand interconnect in a "Drag-onfly+" topology [11,18] with 4 wings. A connectivity diagram is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Resulting Hardware Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Connectivity diagram of Niagara's network interconnect, of Mellanox EDR InfiniBand in a "Dragonfly+" topology[11,18] with 4 wings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of similar topologies attempting to solve some of the complexityrelated issues have been proposed, with fat tree [25], [26] being the most common of them (along with some variations -see, e.g. [27] -flattened fat trees or [28], [29] numerous variants of butterfly networks). Regardless of which class of equipment is used, the resulting multiple tree topologies are substantially redundant, as they tend to provide full mesh connectivity and an equal level of service to all nodes.…”
Section: Data Center Interconnect Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%