2018
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8462.12277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dragon CEOs and Firm Value

Abstract: This article investigates a traditional belief of the Chinese zodiac that individuals born in the dragon year are superior and perform better. Using a sample of listed firms in China, supporting evidence is found for this pervasive superstition that CEOs born in dragon years are positively associated with firm value as measured by Tobin's Q and return on assets. This positive relationship becomes even stronger when the exact birth date of CEOs is known. Finally, the Dragon Survivors Hypothesis and the CEO Self… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although superstition is rooted in cultural traditions and has often been the central pillar of environmental sustainability (Mawere & Awuah-Nyamekye, 2015), there remains limited understanding of how superstition influences environmental sustainability expenditure. Moreover, whilst it is widely recognised that superstition endures in society (Tsang, 2004a;Wang, Hernandez, Minor & Wei, 2012;Ya'akov, Ruffle & Shtudiner, 2018) and that superstition predicts attitudes (Chen, 2018Tsang, 2004b, to date we know little about how these constructs work in concert with one another to influence sustainability expenditure of firms. This issue is particularly important given that superstition is inextricably interwoven with environmental protection (Mawere & Awuah-Nyamekye), and superstition and attitudes are pivotal features of many societies in developing countries (see Tsang, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although superstition is rooted in cultural traditions and has often been the central pillar of environmental sustainability (Mawere & Awuah-Nyamekye, 2015), there remains limited understanding of how superstition influences environmental sustainability expenditure. Moreover, whilst it is widely recognised that superstition endures in society (Tsang, 2004a;Wang, Hernandez, Minor & Wei, 2012;Ya'akov, Ruffle & Shtudiner, 2018) and that superstition predicts attitudes (Chen, 2018Tsang, 2004b, to date we know little about how these constructs work in concert with one another to influence sustainability expenditure of firms. This issue is particularly important given that superstition is inextricably interwoven with environmental protection (Mawere & Awuah-Nyamekye), and superstition and attitudes are pivotal features of many societies in developing countries (see Tsang, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%