2013
DOI: 10.1177/1420326x13515897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drag constants for common indoor bioaerosols

Abstract: In practice, the drag coefficient of a particle is usually calculated using empirical relationships obtained by generalizing experimental data. This study demonstrates that using the default Stokes’ law settings in FLUENT to computationally predict the drag coefficients for bioaerosol deposition is not really appropriate: the average fractional bias is 7% and the average normalized mean square error is 15%. Comparatively, the errors for bacteria (−12% to 24%) are larger than those for fungi (−8% to 26%). These… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three main assumptions are adopted in this paper: (1) Breathing effect of humans are ignored; (2) Movement of people inside the ward is ignored; (3) The sneeze or cough process is simplified according to Wong’s work ( Wong et al., 2015 ); (4) Dry air is adopted (see Figure A1 and Table A1 ); (5) droplet evaporation is ignored. In this paper, an ACH of 2 h −1 , where the total air mass flow rate is 1.24 kg/s, is adopted.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three main assumptions are adopted in this paper: (1) Breathing effect of humans are ignored; (2) Movement of people inside the ward is ignored; (3) The sneeze or cough process is simplified according to Wong’s work ( Wong et al., 2015 ); (4) Dry air is adopted (see Figure A1 and Table A1 ); (5) droplet evaporation is ignored. In this paper, an ACH of 2 h −1 , where the total air mass flow rate is 1.24 kg/s, is adopted.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Each AD proposal, six cases are simulated: (1) Steady state of a one-shot sneeze of Man 1; (2) Transient state of a constant sneeze of Man 1; (3) Steady state of a one-shot sneeze of Man 2; (4) Transient state of a constant sneeze of Man 2; (5) Steady state of a one-shot sneeze of Man 1; (6) Transient state of a constant sneeze of Man 1. The boundary conditions of each steady and transient state are also provided in Table 4 where the physical parameters of the virus particle are referred from Wong et al. (2015) and Gupta et al.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of Eqs. (9) and (10) was established for a range of particles with equivalent bioaerosol diameters (d b ) from 0.69 μm to 6.9 μm and further examined for particles with d b as low as 0.054 μm (Wong et al 2015).…”
Section: Particle Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 ). 26 The insufficient VR office (i.e. 1 ACH) of C. cladosporioides and S. aureus were also demonstrated in the bioaerosol fractional count FC in Figure 8.…”
Section: Results Of the Bioaerosol Exposure In The Office Cubicle Of mentioning
confidence: 94%