2002
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<3058:dcwflw>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drag Coefficients with Fetch-Limited Wind Waves*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is certainly the case for Lake Valkea-Kotinen due to its small size. In order to test the hypothesis that this physical effect plays a significant role, a momentum flux partitioning parameterisation (Appendix 2) was introduced in LAKE model following parameterisations suggested in Lin et al (2002) and Kitaigorodskii and Volkov (1965). This parameterisation includes wind fetch that is set to a constant value of 100 m. The resulting temperature profiles may be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Temperature Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is certainly the case for Lake Valkea-Kotinen due to its small size. In order to test the hypothesis that this physical effect plays a significant role, a momentum flux partitioning parameterisation (Appendix 2) was introduced in LAKE model following parameterisations suggested in Lin et al (2002) and Kitaigorodskii and Volkov (1965). This parameterisation includes wind fetch that is set to a constant value of 100 m. The resulting temperature profiles may be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Temperature Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following (Kitaigorodskii and Volkov, 1965;Lin et al, 2002), one can write: where r a Á the air density, C Á the mean wave phase speed, C wave,10 Á the surface drag coefficient for 10 m height, u 10 Á the wind speed at 10 m over the lake. The difference of formulation used here from that by (Lin et al, 2002) is that C wave,10 is calculated by surface flux scheme of LAKE model, i.e. including effects of stratification, whereas in (Lin et al, 2002) it is given by a logarithmic law.…”
Section: Appendix 2 Momentum Flux Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lin et al () studied the air‐sea momentum flux exchange from the standpoint of waveform drag theory, defining the waveform drag as τp=ρaCD()u10,n0.83Cpu10,n0.83Cp, where C D = [ κ / ln (10/ z 0, n )] 2 (the same as in equation , assuming that the logarithmic wind profile holds), C p is the peak wave phase velocity, and | · | indicates the absolute value for a quantity. It should be stressed that the form drag coefficient C D defined by Lin et al () is related to the roughness length z 0, n instead of the shape of sea waves. García‐Nava et al () and Romero et al () used a similar concept, but a more complicated expression for the form drag coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these functions show major discrepancies. Lin et al (2002) pointed out that the variability of C d not explained by U 10 is substantial. Weaver (2004) used the advanced circulation hurricane storm surge model (ADCIRC) to test the sensitivity of storm surges on seven different C d .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%