The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.6.053101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drag analysis with a self-propelled flexible swimmer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be noted that the Reynolds numbers here are significantly larger than in most previous studies dealing with the skin friction on a flapping foil (Ehrenstein and Eloy, 2013;Ehrenstein et al, 2014;Das et al, 2016Das et al, , 2022Gross et al, 2021). These computationally works for 𝑅𝑒 ≲ 10 3 confirmed the Bone-Lighthill boundary layer thinning hypothesis for uniform flow past oscillatory plates, with skin friction drag coefficients proportional to 𝑅𝑒 −1∕2 , like in Blasius flat plate, but multiplied by a factor proportional to the square root of the ratio of the transverse and longitudinal velocities.…”
Section: Numerical Results Modeling the Unsteady Viscous Dragsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It must be noted that the Reynolds numbers here are significantly larger than in most previous studies dealing with the skin friction on a flapping foil (Ehrenstein and Eloy, 2013;Ehrenstein et al, 2014;Das et al, 2016Das et al, , 2022Gross et al, 2021). These computationally works for 𝑅𝑒 ≲ 10 3 confirmed the Bone-Lighthill boundary layer thinning hypothesis for uniform flow past oscillatory plates, with skin friction drag coefficients proportional to 𝑅𝑒 −1∕2 , like in Blasius flat plate, but multiplied by a factor proportional to the square root of the ratio of the transverse and longitudinal velocities.…”
Section: Numerical Results Modeling the Unsteady Viscous Dragsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Labasse et al (2020) considered 𝑅𝑒 = 2000 for different 𝛼 0 , finding that Blasius-type scaling is not reliable, without providing any scaling law. Gross et al (2021) also considered the range 𝑅𝑒 ≳ 10 3 -10 4 , but neglected the viscous drag for these larger Reynolds numbers, considering only a constant pressure drag coefficient. Here, we use the expression (16) for the timeaverage viscous drag, while all the pressure forces, of any sign, will be modeled with analytical expressions from linear inviscid theory (Section 5 below).…”
Section: Numerical Results Modeling the Unsteady Viscous Dragmentioning
confidence: 99%