1977
DOI: 10.1136/adc.52.10.804-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dr. M. Moncrieff comments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(8 reference statements)
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important aspect, the impact of environmental vertical shear on convective development, was highlighted in the previous section. While shear can disrupt the vertical development of small convective clouds, it is central to the mesoscale organization of convection (Moncrieff 1992, and references therein). In traditional parametrizations, the latter aspect is seldom considered (an exception being Donner 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important aspect, the impact of environmental vertical shear on convective development, was highlighted in the previous section. While shear can disrupt the vertical development of small convective clouds, it is central to the mesoscale organization of convection (Moncrieff 1992, and references therein). In traditional parametrizations, the latter aspect is seldom considered (an exception being Donner 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…vertical shear) on the development of convection. While wind shear tends to have an organizing effect on deep convection (intense thunderstorms and squall lines; see Moncrieff (1992) and references therein), it tends to disrupt shallow cumulus, especially when the shear is unidirectional, as within the westerly wind burst area. A cumulus cloud consists of an aggregate of towers, which rise in succession before dissipating on the down-shear side of the parent cumulus.…”
Section: (A) Summary Of the Emanuel Convection Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such systems may have a dynamical impact on the AEJ through the vertical and meridional transport of momentum (e.g. Moncrieff 1992;LeMone and Moncrieff 1994;Caniaux et al 1995), as well as through modification of the thermodynamic profiles and consequent geostrophic adjustment. The extent to which the AEJ is accelerated or decelerated by these processes remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the tropical squall lines, the LCL is low, CAPE, and thus the Richardson number, are large, so neither steering-level-type convection nor the mixed jump and steering-level model can develop favourably because the moist updraught tends to become downshear. This kind of environment may be in favour of the fast-propagating 3-D jumping convection suggested by Moncrieff (1981). For the mid-latitude squall lines, the LCL is high and the Richardson number is not too large, so it is in favour of an upshear mixed jump and steering-level convection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In those two studies, squall lines were simulated numerically as initial value problems, which were very different from the inviscid steady state model of Moncrieff (1978). By including shallow downdraught cooling and non-constant shear, Thorpe et al (1982) were able to obtain a quasi-steady upshear-sloping updraught in their 2-D model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%