1999
DOI: 10.17016/feds.1999.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Downward Nominal Wage Rigidity: Evidence from the Employment Cost Index

Abstract: We examine the extent of downward nominal wage rigidity using the microdata underlying the BLS employment cost index--an extensive, establishment-based dataset with detailed information on wage and benefit costs. We find stronger evidence of downward nominal wage rigidity than did previous studies using panel data on individuals. Firms appear able to circumvent part, but not all, of this rigidity by varying benefits: Total compensation displays modestly less rigidity than do wages alone. Given our estimated am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
114
0
10

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
114
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In the US, it is certainly the case that a significant group of workers, notably in the union sector, have longer term contracts. It is also the case that Lebow et al (1999) find that the proportion of nominal cuts rises significantly, and the proportion with rigid wages falls significantly, once total compensation is accounted for rather than simply wages and salaries. However, we do not have a complete explanation of these sharp differences between the UK and the US and we leave this issue unresolved.…”
Section: 4 Comparison With the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the US, it is certainly the case that a significant group of workers, notably in the union sector, have longer term contracts. It is also the case that Lebow et al (1999) find that the proportion of nominal cuts rises significantly, and the proportion with rigid wages falls significantly, once total compensation is accounted for rather than simply wages and salaries. However, we do not have a complete explanation of these sharp differences between the UK and the US and we leave this issue unresolved.…”
Section: 4 Comparison With the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3. See for example the evidence provided by Lebow et al . (1995) using an asymmetry measure based on the median for the PSID. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Additional econometric analyses of US, Canadian and UK micro data using first‐wave approaches include Lebow, Stockton and Washer (1995), McLaughlin (1999), Lebow, Saks and Wilson (1999), Christofides and Leung (2000), McLaughlin (2000), Christofides and Stengos (2001) and Nickell and Quintini (2001). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%