2003
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Downward approach to hydrological prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
167
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
167
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While this, understandably, is not an easy thing to do, especially in light of our increasingly available resources, the recent surge in such acknowledgments is indeed encouraging. For example, the studies by Young et al (1996), Grayson and Blöschl (2000), Beven (2002), Woods (2002), Sivapalan et al (2003), Sivakumar (2004b), and Wainwright and Mulligan (2004) advocate in one way or another moving beyond the notion of ''modeling everything'' and adopting the notion of ''capturing the essential features.'' Their argument, in essence, is: ''… we should be developing methods to identify dominant processes that control hydrologic response (in different environments, landscapes and climates, and at different scales) and then developing models to focus on these dominant processes.''…”
Section: Model Simplification and Dominant Processes Conceptmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this, understandably, is not an easy thing to do, especially in light of our increasingly available resources, the recent surge in such acknowledgments is indeed encouraging. For example, the studies by Young et al (1996), Grayson and Blöschl (2000), Beven (2002), Woods (2002), Sivapalan et al (2003), Sivakumar (2004b), and Wainwright and Mulligan (2004) advocate in one way or another moving beyond the notion of ''modeling everything'' and adopting the notion of ''capturing the essential features.'' Their argument, in essence, is: ''… we should be developing methods to identify dominant processes that control hydrologic response (in different environments, landscapes and climates, and at different scales) and then developing models to focus on these dominant processes.''…”
Section: Model Simplification and Dominant Processes Conceptmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is no question that these issues have already been part of our growing research activities: the ideas of model simplification and collection of more reliable but only relevant data towards a more effective and efficient use of our resources are central in many studies of diverse forms (e.g., Jakeman and Hornberger 1993;Hsu et al 1995;Puente and Obregon 1996;Young et al 1996;Grayson and Blöschl 2000;Sivakumar et al 2001;Beven 2002;Young and Parkinson 2002;Wainwright and Mulligan 2004), and the need for a common framework or similar has been recognized by many researchers (e.g., Dooge 1986;Dunne 1998;Gupta et al 2000;Woods 2002;Sivapalan et al 2003;Gupta 2004;Sivakumar 2004b;Sivapalan 2005;Dawdy 2007;Sivakumar et al 2007). The problem, however, is that efforts to bring these mostly disparate studies together, towards finding common grounds in our research, are almost nonexistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, as in Botter et al [2005], an assessment of spatial effects is needed so as to highlight at what nonpoint-source injection scales (relative to correlation scales of heterogeneous properties) one could assume the processes as chiefly driven only by contact times between fixed and mobile phases. A distinct advantage of SAS function approaches is that transport parameters pertaining to travel times may be decoupled from the ones Sivapalan et al, 2003]. A top-down approach requires application to a large number of systems where appropriate data are available, and eventually a synthesis of the estimated SAS functions to infer patterns.…”
Section: 1002/2015wr017273mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As experimental evidence has mounted on the mutual links among the hydrochemistry of waters in storage and in fluxes, climatic regimes, soil and landscape attributes, and the age of streamflows [e.g., Weiler and Fl€ uhler, 2004;McGuire et al, 2005;Hrachowitz et al, 2009;Soulsby et al, 2011;Tetzlaff et al, 2014], a growing awareness has developed of the fundamental importance of a unifying theoretical framework for catchment-scale flow and transport phenomena [e.g., Rinaldo and Marani, 1987;Kirchner, 2003;Sivapalan et al, 2003]. Such a framework must formally characterize the age dynamics in hydrologic systems and, as a consequence, comprehensively recapitulate hydrograph and tracer information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While high complexity is desirable to simulate a rich class of emergent patterns, such models when calibrated, especially for sparsely gauged basins (in terms either of socio-economic or hydrological data), may not reliably predict the dynamics driven by future yet unseen exogenous forcing. See for example Sivapalan et al (2003), Jakeman and Letcher (2003), Fenicia et al (2008), Pande et al (2012), Pande (2013), and Arkesteijn and Pande (2013) for extensive analyses of the relationships between model complexity, model structure deficiency, prediction uncertainty. Furthermore, the differences in the shapes of the curves between observations and predictions, especially in the case of irrigation area, points to model improvements that can still be made: for example, the assumption that attractiveness level is a function of irrigation potential may have to be improved with the hindsight of additional data.…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Dynamics Of The State Variables And Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%